VMOT vs. GKAT
VMOT (Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF) and GKAT (Scharf Global Opportunity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VMOT is a Momentum fund tracking the Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend Index, while GKAT is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Scharf Investments. VMOT is passively managed, while GKAT is actively managed. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VMOT charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for GKAT.
Performance
VMOT vs. GKAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMOT achieves a 13.93% return, which is significantly higher than GKAT's 9.91% return.
VMOT
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 13.93%
- 1Y
- 28.99%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.81%
GKAT
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $55.81K | $70.15K | $140.36K | |
| $66.38K | $54.09K | $71.17K |
VMOT vs. GKAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF | 13.93% | 7.66% |
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF | 9.91% | 5.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMOT and GKAT is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMOT vs. GKAT — Risk / Return Rank
VMOT
GKAT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VMOT vs. GKAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VMOT | GKAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VMOT vs. GKAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMOT drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, which is greater than GKAT's maximum drawdown of -10.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMOT and GKAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMOT | GKAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.71% | -10.41% | -24.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | -0.79% | -2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.13% | -2.27% | -10.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | — | — |
Volatility
VMOT vs. GKAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMOT | GKAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.17% | 12.28% | +3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 12.28% | +3.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 12.28% | +2.65% |
VMOT vs. GKAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMOT has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GKAT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
VMOT vs. GKAT - Dividend Comparison
VMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than GKAT's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF | 0.64% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF | 1.80% | 2.05% | 2.54% | 4.13% | 2.24% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMOT and GKAT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GKAT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GKAT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for VMOT.
VMOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.64% for GKAT.
VMOT is categorized as Momentum, while GKAT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Scharf Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for VMOT and 0.59% for GKAT.
Find the right allocation for VMOT and GKAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer