PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMOT vs. BBLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMOT vs. BBLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMOT achieves a 13.93% return, which is significantly higher than BBLU's 11.27% return.


VMOT

1D
0.25%
1M
0.02%
6M
6.39%
YTD
13.93%
1Y
28.99%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.81%

BBLU

1D
0.95%
1M
1.37%
6M
9.83%
YTD
11.27%
1Y
24.50%
3Y*
21.42%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.05M$1.03M$1.28M
$66.38K$54.09K$71.17K

VMOT vs. BBLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VMOT
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF
13.93%18.54%12.07%-0.74%-4.16%
BBLU
Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF
11.27%18.40%27.47%31.11%6.39%

Correlation

The correlation between VMOT and BBLU is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2022

0.58

The correlation between VMOT and BBLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.68 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VMOT vs. BBLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VMOT
BBLU

Industrials

19.9%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

18.8%
9.5%

Technology

11.4%
31.5%

Energy

8.6%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
8.8%

Healthcare

8.4%
14.2%

Financial Services

8.1%
15.9%

Communication Services

7.3%
12.6%

Basic Materials

5.1%

-

Utilities

3.3%

-

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Industrials

VMOT
19.9%
BBLU
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VMOT
18.8%
BBLU
9.5%

Technology

VMOT
11.4%
BBLU
31.5%

Energy

VMOT
8.6%
BBLU
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

VMOT
8.5%
BBLU
8.8%

Healthcare

VMOT
8.4%
BBLU
14.2%

Financial Services

VMOT
8.1%
BBLU
15.9%

Communication Services

VMOT
7.3%
BBLU
12.6%

Basic Materials

VMOT
5.1%
BBLU

-

Utilities

VMOT
3.3%
BBLU

-

Real Estate

VMOT
0.6%
BBLU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMOT vs. BBLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VMOT
VMOT Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VMOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VMOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BBLU
BBLU Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VMOT vs. BBLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMOTBBLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

3.41

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.01

12.18

-2.17

VMOT vs. BBLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the BBLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMOT and BBLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMOT vs. BBLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMOT drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, which is greater than BBLU's maximum drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMOT and BBLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMOTBBLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.71%

-17.20%

-17.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.85%

-7.22%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.23%

-17.20%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

0.00%

-3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.13%

-1.98%

-11.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.02%

+0.88%

Volatility

VMOT vs. BBLU - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) at 3.08%. This indicates that VMOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMOTBBLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

3.08%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.85%

8.62%

+5.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

11.43%

+4.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.74%

14.43%

+1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.93%

14.43%

+0.50%

VMOT vs. BBLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMOT has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BBLU's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMOT vs. BBLU - Dividend Comparison

VMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than BBLU's 1.13% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBLU
Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF
1.13%1.25%1.39%1.68%32.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VMOT
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF
1.80%2.05%2.54%4.13%2.24%0.82%0.00%1.76%0.93%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMOT and BBLU have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VMOT has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to BBLU (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMOT dropped -34.71% vs BBLU's -17.20%.

On 3-year performance, BBLU leads with 21.42% vs 16.72% for VMOT. On fees, BBLU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BBLU has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BBLU has performed better with a 21.42% return vs 16.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBLU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for VMOT.

VMOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.13% for BBLU.

VMOT is categorized as Momentum, while BBLU is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for VMOT and 0.15% for BBLU.

BBLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMOT and BBLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer