VMIG.L vs. IMSU.L
VMIG.L (Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating) and IMSU.L (iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - VMIG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while IMSU.L is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VMIG.L returned 6.27%/yr vs 6.55%/yr for IMSU.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VMIG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IMSU.L.
Performance
VMIG.L vs. IMSU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VMIG.L is traded in GBP, while IMSU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IMSU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMIG.L achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than IMSU.L's 13.42% return.
VMIG.L
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 8.43%
- 1Y
- 12.81%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- —
IMSU.L
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 13.42%
- 6M
- 14.88%
- 1Y
- 20.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- —
VMIG.L vs. IMSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMIG.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating | 5.33% | 13.52% | 11.01% | 11.96% | -14.58% | 19.28% | -2.22% | 17.54% |
IMSU.L iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 13.42% | 3.37% | 0.69% | 6.26% | -1.35% | 28.63% | 16.34% | 13.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMIG.L and IMSU.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019 | 0.53 |
The correlation between VMIG.L and IMSU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
VMIG.L vs. IMSU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VMIG.L
IMSU.L
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Industrials
VMIG.L
IMSU.L
-
Financial Services
VMIG.L
IMSU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
VMIG.L
IMSU.L
Real Estate
VMIG.L
IMSU.L
-
Technology
VMIG.L
IMSU.L
-
Basic Materials
VMIG.L
IMSU.L
Consumer Defensive
VMIG.L
IMSU.L
-
Communication Services
VMIG.L
IMSU.L
-
Healthcare
VMIG.L
IMSU.L
-
Utilities
VMIG.L
IMSU.L
-
Energy
VMIG.L
IMSU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMIG.L vs. IMSU.L — Risk / Return Rank
VMIG.L
IMSU.L
VMIG.L vs. IMSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VMIG.L | IMSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.23 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 1.86 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | 6.07 | -2.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VMIG.L vs. IMSU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMIG.L drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, which is greater than IMSU.L's maximum drawdown of -33.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMIG.L and IMSU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMIG.L | IMSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.38% | -33.22% | -8.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.59% | -10.76% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.60% | -25.16% | +10.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.02% | -25.16% | -1.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -2.70% | +2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.76% | -11.19% | +3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 3.31% | -0.08% |
Volatility
VMIG.L vs. IMSU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) is 3.69%, while iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that VMIG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMIG.L | IMSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 5.66% | -1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.30% | 12.26% | -1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 15.12% | -2.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 21.54% | -6.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 24.98% | -7.61% |
VMIG.L vs. IMSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMIG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IMSU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VMIG.L vs. IMSU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VMIG.L nor IMSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMSU.L iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VMIG.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.51% | 3.22% | 3.33% | 3.21% | 2.55% | 2.05% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMIG.L and IMSU.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VMIG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VMIG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IMSU.L.
VMIG.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while IMSU.L is Materials. VMIG.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while IMSU.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VMIG.L and 0.15% for IMSU.L.
Find the right allocation for VMIG.L and IMSU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer