VMIG.L vs. VUKG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) and Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VUKG.L).
VMIG.L and VUKG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VMIG.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. It was launched on May 14, 2019. VUKG.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. It was launched on May 14, 2019. Both VMIG.L and VUKG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VMIG.L or VUKG.L.
Key characteristics
| VMIG.L | VUKG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.48% | 11.78% |
| 1Y Return | 19.37% | 18.77% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.33% | 11.38% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.86% | 9.73% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.46 | 1.77 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.20 | 2.62 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.27 | 1.32 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.96 | 4.16 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.77 | 12.82 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.43% | 1.38% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.91% | 10.01% |
| Max Drawdown | -41.38% | -34.32% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.47% | -3.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMIG.L and VUKG.L is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VMIG.L vs. VUKG.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VMIG.L achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly lower than VUKG.L's 11.78% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VMIG.L vs. VUKG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMIG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VUKG.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VMIG.L vs. VUKG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) and Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VUKG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VMIG.L vs. VUKG.L - Dividend Comparison
VMIG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUKG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMIG.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUKG.L Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating | 3.68% | 3.71% | 3.84% | 3.84% | 3.06% | 1.92% |
Drawdowns
VMIG.L vs. VUKG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMIG.L drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, which is greater than VUKG.L's maximum drawdown of -34.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMIG.L and VUKG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VMIG.L vs. VUKG.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) and Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VUKG.L) have volatilities of 3.92% and 3.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.