PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VMID.L vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VMID.L vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VMID.L (Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VMID.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VMID.L returned 5.85%/yr vs 16.42%/yr for VOO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VMID.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

VMID.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VMID.L is traded in GBP, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMID.L achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.79% return. Over the past 10 years, VMID.L has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 5.85%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.42% annualized return.

VMID.L

1D
0.59%
1M
4.12%
YTD
5.14%
6M
7.30%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*
5.85%

VOO

1D
0.39%
1M
5.58%
YTD
11.79%
6M
10.50%
1Y
29.87%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
15.22%
10Y*
16.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMID.L vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMID.L
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing		5.14%12.87%7.42%8.16%-17.36%16.04%-4.93%29.17%-13.15%17.24%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		11.79%9.43%27.16%20.01%-8.44%30.01%14.85%26.37%1.16%11.24%

Correlation

The correlation between VMID.L and VOO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.35

The correlation between VMID.L and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VMID.L vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VMID.L
VOO

Industrials

19.9%
8.3%

Financial Services

19.4%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.3%
10.2%

Real Estate

9.4%
1.9%

Technology

9.4%
35.7%

Basic Materials

6.6%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
4.9%

Communication Services

5.9%
11.3%

Healthcare

4.4%
8.5%

Utilities

3.0%
2.4%

Energy

2.5%
3.5%

Industrials

VMID.L
19.9%
VOO
8.3%

Financial Services

VMID.L
19.4%
VOO
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VMID.L
13.3%
VOO
10.2%

Real Estate

VMID.L
9.4%
VOO
1.9%

Technology

VMID.L
9.4%
VOO
35.7%

Basic Materials

VMID.L
6.6%
VOO
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

VMID.L
6.1%
VOO
4.9%

Communication Services

VMID.L
5.9%
VOO
11.3%

Healthcare

VMID.L
4.4%
VOO
8.5%

Utilities

VMID.L
3.0%
VOO
2.4%

Energy

VMID.L
2.5%
VOO
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Often compared with VMID.L:
VMID.L vs. VUKE.LVMID.L vs. VMIG.LVMID.L vs. MIDD.LVMID.L vs. VUKG.LVMID.L vs. JGGI.LVMID.L vs. PSH.ASVMID.L vs. SMH
Often compared with VOO:
VOO vs. VTIVOO vs. QQQVOO vs. SCHDVOO vs. VTVOO vs. SPYVOO vs. FXAIXVOO vs. IVV

Return for Risk

VMID.L vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VMID.L
VMID.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VMID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VMID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMID.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VMID.LVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.13
2.62

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.70
3.39

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.49

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

3.92

-2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.35

15.01

-10.66

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VMID.L vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMID.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMID.L and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VMID.LVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

2.62

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.97

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.91

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.95

-0.55

Drawdowns

VMID.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMID.L drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMID.L and VOO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VMID.LVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.85%

-26.09%

-15.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-7.66%

-3.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.97%

-21.93%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.51%

-21.93%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.85%

-26.09%

-15.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

0.00%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-3.30%

-4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

2.00%

+1.23%

Volatility

VMID.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.55%. This indicates that VMID.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VMID.LVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

2.55%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

8.14%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.41%

11.44%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

15.77%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

18.09%

-1.56%

VMID.L vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMID.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VMID.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VMID.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VMID.L
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing		3.65%3.90%3.30%3.41%3.30%2.55%2.08%2.82%3.59%3.19%3.08%3.09%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

VMID.L and VOO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VMID.L.

VMID.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. VMID.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VMID.L and 0.03% for VOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMID.L and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer