VMID.L vs. VUKG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) and Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VUKG.L).
VMID.L and VUKG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VMID.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. It was launched on Sep 30, 2014. VUKG.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. It was launched on May 14, 2019. Both VMID.L and VUKG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VMID.L or VUKG.L.
Key characteristics
| VMID.L | VUKG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.57% | 11.05% |
| 1Y Return | 16.88% | 16.48% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.39% | 11.51% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.59% | 9.59% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.44 | 1.80 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.11 | 2.66 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.26 | 1.32 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.85 | 4.23 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.63 | 13.17 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.37% | 1.37% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.58% | 10.09% |
| Max Drawdown | -41.85% | -34.32% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.36% | -3.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMID.L and VUKG.L is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VMID.L vs. VUKG.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VMID.L achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly lower than VUKG.L's 11.05% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VMID.L vs. VUKG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMID.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VUKG.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VMID.L vs. VUKG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) and Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VUKG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VMID.L vs. VUKG.L - Dividend Comparison
VMID.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than VUKG.L's 3.70% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMID.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.30% | 2.55% | 2.08% | 2.82% | 3.59% | 3.19% | 3.08% | 3.09% | 0.60% |
VUKG.L Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating | 3.70% | 3.71% | 3.84% | 3.84% | 3.06% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VMID.L vs. VUKG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMID.L drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, which is greater than VUKG.L's maximum drawdown of -34.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMID.L and VUKG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VMID.L vs. VUKG.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) and Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VUKG.L) have volatilities of 3.93% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.