VMID.DE vs. AMED.DE
VMID.DE (Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - VMID.DE tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VMID.DE returned 3.22%/yr vs 10.41%/yr for AMED.DE. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VMID.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
VMID.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMID.DE achieves a 5.91% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return.
VMID.DE
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 5.91%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 11.06%
- 3Y*
- 10.20%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- —
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.54%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
VMID.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMID.DE Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing | 5.91% | 8.64% | 11.29% | 10.54% | -21.96% | 23.06% | -8.99% | 38.05% | -15.29% | 2.75% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | -1.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMID.DE and AMED.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.75 |
The correlation between VMID.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMID.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
VMID.DE
AMED.DE
VMID.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMID.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.33 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 2.49 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.57 | 9.40 | -5.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMID.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 1.74 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.65 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.47 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
VMID.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMID.DE drawdown since its inception was -46.58%, which is greater than AMED.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMID.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMID.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.58% | -38.35% | -8.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.96% | -10.56% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.34% | -14.07% | -4.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.26% | -24.06% | -8.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -0.17% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -6.69% | -3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 2.81% | +0.28% |
Volatility
VMID.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.DE) is 4.53%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that VMID.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMID.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 5.61% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 12.64% | -1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.71% | 15.19% | -1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 15.87% | +0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 17.00% | +1.80% |
VMID.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMID.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VMID.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
VMID.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, while AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VMID.DE Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing | 3.65% | 3.95% | 3.29% | 3.44% | 3.41% | 2.51% | 2.04% | 2.74% | 3.69% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMID.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VMID.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VMID.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.
VMID.DE tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VMID.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for VMID.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer