PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VMID.DE vs. CEMT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

VMID.DE vs. CEMT.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE).

VMID.DE and CEMT.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VMID.DE is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. It was launched on Sep 30, 2014. CEMT.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe Mid Cap Equal Weighted. It was launched on Jan 16, 2015. Both VMID.DE and CEMT.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

VMID.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VMID.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMID.DE
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing		-3.14%8.64%11.29%10.54%-21.96%23.06%-8.99%38.05%-15.29%2.75%
CEMT.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF		0.00%17.53%5.08%14.19%-18.24%19.63%1.61%28.81%-13.99%-0.17%

Returns By Period

VMID.DE

1D
2.33%
1M
-6.96%
YTD
-3.14%
6M
-0.55%
1Y
9.95%
3Y*
8.30%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*
—

CEMT.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
2.05%
1Y
11.76%
3Y*
9.56%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
6.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF

Often compared with VMID.DE:
VMID.DE vs. IAEX.ASVMID.DE vs. SPYVMID.DE vs. SCHDVMID.DE vs. VUSA.DEVMID.DE vs. AMES.DEVMID.DE vs. ELFC.DEVMID.DE vs. EUN0.DE
Often compared with CEMT.DE:
CEMT.DE vs. LYY0.DECEMT.DE vs. QDVC.DECEMT.DE vs. IBC0.DECEMT.DE vs. ZPRX.DECEMT.DE vs. ENGW.LCEMT.DE vs. EUFM.LCEMT.DE vs. WTD7.DE

VMID.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMID.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMT.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

CEMT.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF
VMID.DE
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing

Return for Risk

VMID.DE vs. CEMT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VMID.DE
VMID.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VMID.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMID.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMID.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VMID.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMID.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE
CEMT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CEMT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMID.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VMID.DECEMT.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

1.08

-0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.92

1.43

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.32

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

1.06

-0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.30

6.26

-2.95

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VMID.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMID.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the CEMT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMID.DE and CEMT.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VMID.DECEMT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

1.08

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.34

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.41

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.38

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between VMID.DE and CEMT.DE is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

VMID.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Dividend Comparison

VMID.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, while CEMT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMID.DE
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing		4.00%3.95%3.29%3.44%3.41%2.51%2.04%2.74%3.69%0.72%
CEMT.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VMID.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMID.DE drawdown since its inception was -46.58%, which is greater than CEMT.DE's maximum drawdown of -37.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMID.DE and CEMT.DE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

VMID.DECEMT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.58%

-37.66%

-8.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.78%

-11.13%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.26%

-29.23%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-37.66%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.39%

-0.39%

-8.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.82%

-7.18%

-3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

1.88%

+1.05%

Volatility

VMID.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE) at 0.00%. This indicates that VMID.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

VMID.DECEMT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.43%

0.00%

+5.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

2.43%

+6.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

11.90%

+3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.32%

14.79%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.80%

16.20%

+2.60%