VMFVX vs. CISMX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

VMFVX (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares) and CISMX (Clarkston Partners Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, VMFVX returned 10.61%/yr vs 6.79%/yr for CISMX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. VMFVX charges 0.08%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for CISMX.

Performance

VMFVX vs. CISMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) and Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMFVX achieves a 13.52% return, which is significantly higher than CISMX's 9.60% return. Over the past 10 years, VMFVX has outperformed CISMX with an annualized return of 10.61%, while CISMX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.79% annualized return.

VMFVX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 1.00%
• 6M: 9.03%
• YTD: 13.52%
• 1Y: 23.10%
• 3Y*: 12.01%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: 10.61%
• ALL TIME*: 10.87%

CISMX

• 1D: -2.88%
• 1M: 0.58%
• 6M: 6.31%
• YTD: 9.60%
• 1Y: 12.37%
• 3Y*: 1.88%
• 5Y*: 1.64%
• 10Y*: 6.79%
• ALL TIME*: 7.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VMFVX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

VMFVX vs. CISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VMFVX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares	13.52%	7.57%	10.59%	16.49%	-7.03%	30.54%	3.68%	26.18%	-11.90%	12.27%
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund	9.60%	-8.37%	4.49%	6.41%	-0.40%	7.94%	17.42%	23.98%	-7.25%	12.84%

Correlation

The correlation between VMFVX and CISMX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2015	0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between VMFVX and CISMX has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

VMFVX vs. CISMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VMFVX

VMFVX Risk / Return Rank: 54
VMFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
VMFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
VMFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
VMFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
VMFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

CISMX

CISMX Risk / Return Rank: 15
CISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
CISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
CISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
CISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
CISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VMFVX vs. CISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) and Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VMFVX	CISMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	0.51	+0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	0.89	+1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.10	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	0.93	+0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.84	2.02	+4.82

VMFVX vs. CISMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMFVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the CISMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMFVX and CISMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VMFVX vs. CISMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMFVX drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, which is greater than CISMX's maximum drawdown of -33.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMFVX and CISMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VMFVX	CISMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.79%	-33.80%	-11.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.52%	-10.54%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.46%	-21.19%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.46%	-21.19%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.79%	-33.80%	-11.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.01%	-6.19%	+5.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.43%	-6.75%	+1.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	4.82%	-1.86%

Volatility

VMFVX vs. CISMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) is 3.41%, while Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) has a volatility of 8.99%. This indicates that VMFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VMFVX	CISMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.41%	8.99%	-5.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.33%	15.21%	-4.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.96%	19.00%	-4.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.27%	17.89%	+1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.81%	18.45%	+3.36%

VMFVX vs. CISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMFVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CISMX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

VMFVX vs. CISMX - Dividend Comparison

VMFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than CISMX's 4.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund	4.25%	4.65%	1.05%	3.76%	16.95%	0.81%	3.73%	3.79%	7.15%	1.30%	1.17%	0.09%
VMFVX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares	1.66%	1.88%	1.81%	1.58%	2.04%	1.81%	2.48%	1.94%	2.01%	1.56%	1.42%	1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VMFVX and CISMX in my portfolio?

VMFVX and CISMX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VMFVX or CISMX?

CISMX has higher volatility (8.99%) compared to VMFVX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMFVX dropped -45.79% vs CISMX's -33.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VMFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.