CISMX vs. CGJIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX).
CISMX is managed by Clarkston Funds. It was launched on Sep 15, 2015. CGJIX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on Jun 19, 2015.
Performance
CISMX vs. CGJIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CISMX vs. CGJIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund | -4.68% | -8.37% | 4.49% | 6.41% | -0.40% | 7.94% | 17.42% | 23.98% | -7.25% | 12.84% |
CGJIX Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund | -9.44% | 14.56% | 27.74% | 36.66% | -26.84% | 26.13% | 38.69% | 35.29% | 0.74% | 27.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CISMX achieves a -4.68% return, which is significantly higher than CGJIX's -9.44% return. Over the past 10 years, CISMX has underperformed CGJIX with an annualized return of 5.84%, while CGJIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.35% annualized return.
CISMX
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -8.24%
- YTD
- -4.68%
- 6M
- -5.79%
- 1Y
- -7.11%
- 3Y*
- -0.97%
- 5Y*
- -1.61%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
CGJIX
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -8.33%
- YTD
- -9.44%
- 6M
- -7.33%
- 1Y
- 13.17%
- 3Y*
- 17.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CISMX vs. CGJIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CISMX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CGJIX's 0.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CISMX vs. CGJIX — Risk / Return Rank
CISMX
CGJIX
CISMX vs. CGJIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CISMX | CGJIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | 0.67 | -1.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | 1.11 | -1.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.16 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 0.86 | -1.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.71 | 3.67 | -5.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CISMX | CGJIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 | 0.67 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.53 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.77 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.77 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between CISMX and CGJIX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CISMX vs. CGJIX - Dividend Comparison
CISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than CGJIX's 3.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund | 4.88% | 4.65% | 1.05% | 3.76% | 16.95% | 0.81% | 3.73% | 3.79% | 7.15% | 1.30% | 1.17% | 0.09% |
CGJIX Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund | 3.36% | 3.05% | 2.04% | 0.53% | 0.51% | 1.85% | 1.76% | 1.64% | 5.72% | 2.19% | 1.13% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CISMX vs. CGJIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CISMX drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, which is greater than CGJIX's maximum drawdown of -31.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CISMX and CGJIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CISMX | CGJIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -31.18% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.26% | -12.62% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.19% | -31.18% | +9.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.80% | -31.18% | -2.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.41% | -11.15% | -7.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.55% | -5.53% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 2.97% | +1.70% |
Volatility
CISMX vs. CGJIX - Volatility Comparison
Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) have volatilities of 4.82% and 4.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CISMX | CGJIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 4.74% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 10.20% | +2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.82% | 20.14% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 19.77% | -2.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 19.98% | -1.77% |