PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CISMX vs. VETAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CISMX vs. VETAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) and Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class A (VETAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CISMX achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly lower than VETAX's 14.22% return. Over the past 10 years, CISMX has underperformed VETAX with an annualized return of 6.79%, while VETAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.76% annualized return.


CISMX

1D
-2.88%
1M
0.58%
6M
6.31%
YTD
9.60%
1Y
12.37%
3Y*
1.88%
5Y*
1.64%
10Y*
6.79%
ALL TIME*
7.34%

VETAX

1D
-0.47%
1M
-0.18%
6M
8.08%
YTD
14.22%
1Y
17.43%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
7.65%
10Y*
10.76%
ALL TIME*
9.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CISMX vs. VETAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CISMX
Clarkston Partners Fund
9.60%-8.37%4.49%6.41%-0.40%7.94%17.42%23.98%-7.25%12.84%
VETAX
Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class A
14.22%2.15%9.80%10.06%-2.85%31.49%7.79%28.38%-10.33%15.67%

Correlation

The correlation between CISMX and VETAX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2015

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between CISMX and VETAX has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CISMX vs. VETAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CISMX
CISMX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
CISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
CISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

VETAX
VETAX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VETAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VETAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VETAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
VETAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VETAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CISMX vs. VETAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) and Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class A (VETAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CISMXVETAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.23

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

2.14

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.02

6.82

-4.80

CISMX vs. VETAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CISMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the VETAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CISMX and VETAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CISMX vs. VETAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CISMX drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, smaller than the maximum VETAX drawdown of -48.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CISMX and VETAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CISMXVETAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.80%

-48.94%

+15.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.54%

-7.49%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.19%

-20.47%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.19%

-20.47%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

-41.04%

+7.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.19%

-1.47%

-4.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-6.31%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.82%

2.35%

+2.47%

Volatility

CISMX vs. VETAX - Volatility Comparison

Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) has a higher volatility of 8.99% compared to Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class A (VETAX) at 2.64%. This indicates that CISMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VETAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CISMXVETAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.99%

2.64%

+6.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.21%

8.58%

+6.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.00%

12.31%

+6.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.89%

16.89%

+1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.45%

19.17%

-0.72%

CISMX vs. VETAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CISMX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than VETAX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

CISMX vs. VETAX - Dividend Comparison

CISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, which matches VETAX's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CISMX
Clarkston Partners Fund
4.25%4.65%1.05%3.76%16.95%0.81%3.73%3.79%7.15%1.30%1.17%0.09%
VETAX
Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class A
4.22%4.31%11.24%5.86%7.95%8.10%5.20%5.81%10.32%3.03%1.32%11.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


CISMX and VETAX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CISMX has higher volatility (8.99%) compared to VETAX (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CISMX dropped -33.80% vs VETAX's -48.94%.

VETAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CISMX and VETAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer