PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMFGX vs. KMKNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMFGX vs. KMKNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMFGX achieves a 16.88% return, which is significantly higher than KMKNX's 15.09% return. Over the past 10 years, VMFGX has underperformed KMKNX with an annualized return of 11.16%, while KMKNX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.86% annualized return.


VMFGX

1D
-1.06%
1M
-1.66%
6M
10.60%
YTD
16.88%
1Y
22.68%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*
11.16%

KMKNX

1D
1.18%
1M
3.36%
6M
6.89%
YTD
15.09%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
33.19%
5Y*
16.56%
10Y*
19.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMFGX vs. KMKNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMFGX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
16.88%7.43%15.86%17.42%-18.99%18.83%22.61%26.20%-10.39%19.87%
KMKNX
Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class
15.09%-3.09%84.05%-7.34%14.98%28.03%19.56%22.76%-10.68%47.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VMFGX and KMKNX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.56

The correlation between VMFGX and KMKNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMFGX vs. KMKNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMFGX
VMFGX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VMFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
VMFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

KMKNX
KMKNX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
KMKNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMKNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMKNX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
KMKNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMKNX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMFGX vs. KMKNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMFGXKMKNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.05

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

0.20

+2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.19

0.47

+8.72

VMFGX vs. KMKNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the KMKNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMFGX and KMKNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMFGX vs. KMKNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMFGX drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, smaller than the maximum KMKNX drawdown of -65.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMFGX and KMKNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMFGXKMKNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.15%

-65.47%

+26.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.91%

-20.13%

+10.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.45%

-28.27%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.25%

-31.47%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.15%

-31.47%

-7.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

-15.60%

+11.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.67%

-15.29%

+9.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

8.68%

-6.13%

Volatility

VMFGX vs. KMKNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX) is 5.48%, while Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX) has a volatility of 6.64%. This indicates that VMFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMKNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMFGXKMKNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

6.64%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.83%

19.71%

-5.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.66%

24.33%

-6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.72%

26.57%

-5.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.05%

23.76%

-2.71%

VMFGX vs. KMKNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMFGX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than KMKNX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMFGX vs. KMKNX - Dividend Comparison

VMFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than KMKNX's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KMKNX
Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class
0.57%0.66%0.81%0.87%1.36%1.56%0.26%0.33%9.13%0.64%0.00%0.00%
VMFGX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.60%0.70%0.84%1.21%1.12%0.53%0.79%1.22%1.18%0.93%1.14%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMFGX and KMKNX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMKNX has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to VMFGX (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMFGX dropped -39.15% vs KMKNX's -65.47%.

VMFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMFGX and KMKNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer