KMKNX vs. FCGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX).
KMKNX is an actively managed fund by Kinetics. It was launched on Jan 31, 2006. FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.
Performance
KMKNX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KMKNX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMKNX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class | 20.82% | -3.09% | 84.05% | -7.34% | 14.98% | 28.03% | 19.56% | 22.76% | -10.68% | 47.26% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | -6.64% | 25.52% | 38.00% | 45.97% | -32.15% | 25.13% | 70.01% | 39.75% | -4.03% | 37.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMKNX achieves a 20.82% return, which is significantly higher than FCGSX's -6.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with KMKNX having a 20.93% annualized return and FCGSX not far ahead at 21.43%.
KMKNX
- 1D
- -4.58%
- 1M
- -7.37%
- YTD
- 20.82%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 6.42%
- 3Y*
- 31.78%
- 5Y*
- 15.03%
- 10Y*
- 20.93%
FCGSX
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -6.64%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 33.82%
- 3Y*
- 27.05%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 21.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KMKNX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
KMKNX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KMKNX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank
KMKNX
FCGSX
KMKNX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KMKNX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.28 | 1.40 | -1.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.56 | 2.02 | -1.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.29 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 2.25 | -1.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.48 | 10.23 | -9.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KMKNX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 1.40 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.61 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.93 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.87 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between KMKNX and FCGSX is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
KMKNX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison
KMKNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than FCGSX's 11.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMKNX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class | 0.55% | 0.66% | 0.81% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 1.56% | 0.26% | 0.33% | 9.13% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 11.22% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
KMKNX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMKNX drawdown since its inception was -65.47%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMKNX and FCGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMKNX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.47% | -38.77% | -26.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.52% | -13.10% | -6.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.47% | -38.77% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.47% | -38.77% | +7.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.40% | -10.42% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.30% | -7.05% | -8.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.57% | 2.88% | +7.69% |
Volatility
KMKNX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison
Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX) has a higher volatility of 7.15% compared to Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) at 6.66%. This indicates that KMKNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KMKNX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.15% | 6.66% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.83% | 13.74% | +4.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.62% | 23.80% | +0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.44% | 23.62% | +2.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.39% | 23.15% | +0.24% |