PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMBS vs. VCIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMBS vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMBS achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly higher than VCIT's 0.31% return. Over the past 10 years, VMBS has underperformed VCIT with an annualized return of 1.36%, while VCIT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.97% annualized return.


VMBS

1D
0.04%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.70%
6M
1.11%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
0.49%
10Y*
1.36%

VCIT

1D
0.13%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.39%
1Y
5.69%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*
2.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMBS vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMBS
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.70%8.36%1.70%5.34%-11.90%-1.28%3.76%6.19%0.91%2.47%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.31%9.34%3.20%8.98%-13.98%-1.77%9.46%14.10%-1.74%5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between VMBS and VCIT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009

0.73

The correlation between VMBS and VCIT shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.93 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMBS vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMBS
VMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMBS vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMBSVCITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.25

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

1.93

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.83

6.44

+1.39

VMBS vs. VCIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the VCIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMBS and VCIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMBSVCITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

1.40

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.19

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.47

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.76

-0.30

Drawdowns

VMBS vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMBS drawdown since its inception was -17.47%, smaller than the maximum VCIT drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMBS and VCIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMBSVCITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.47%

-20.56%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-2.96%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.65%

-6.11%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.12%

-20.56%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.47%

-20.56%

+3.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-1.22%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

-3.16%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

0.89%

-0.09%

Volatility

VMBS vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) at 1.38%. This indicates that VMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMBSVCITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

1.38%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.16%

3.06%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

4.10%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.77%

6.61%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.40%

6.28%

-0.88%

VMBS vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMBS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VMBS vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison

VMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than VCIT's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.80%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%
VMBS
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
4.18%4.20%3.94%3.31%2.35%1.02%2.01%2.77%2.72%2.16%2.10%2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VMBS and VCIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VMBS has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to VCIT (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMBS dropped -17.47% vs VCIT's -20.56%.

On 10-year performance, VCIT leads with 2.97% vs 1.36% for VMBS. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VCIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VCIT has performed better with a 2.97% return vs 1.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for VMBS.

VCIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 4.18% for VMBS.

VMBS is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while VCIT is Corporate Bonds. VMBS tracks Barclays Capital U.S. MBS Index, while VCIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VMBS and 0.03% for VCIT.

VMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMBS and VCIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer