PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMAX vs. HQGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMAX vs. HQGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) and Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMAX achieves a 15.89% return, which is significantly higher than HQGO's 6.07% return.


VMAX

1D
0.74%
1M
3.06%
YTD
15.89%
6M
14.20%
1Y
29.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HQGO

1D
-0.21%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
6.07%
6M
4.52%
1Y
19.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMAX vs. HQGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VMAX
Hartford US Value ETF
15.89%15.65%15.89%5.71%
HQGO
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
6.07%15.15%25.09%5.10%

Correlation

The correlation between VMAX and HQGO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023

0.70

The correlation between VMAX and HQGO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

VMAX vs. HQGO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VMAX
HQGO

Financial Services

32.4%
6.0%

Technology

13.3%
42.1%

Healthcare

11.1%
9.2%

Energy

11.0%
3.6%

Communication Services

6.6%
13.1%

Industrials

5.5%
6.1%

Utilities

5.3%
0.1%

Real Estate

4.4%
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.9%

Basic Materials

2.8%
1.8%

Financial Services

VMAX
32.4%
HQGO
6.0%

Technology

VMAX
13.3%
HQGO
42.1%

Healthcare

VMAX
11.1%
HQGO
9.2%

Energy

VMAX
11.0%
HQGO
3.6%

Communication Services

VMAX
6.6%
HQGO
13.1%

Industrials

VMAX
5.5%
HQGO
6.1%

Utilities

VMAX
5.3%
HQGO
0.1%

Real Estate

VMAX
4.4%
HQGO
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VMAX
3.7%
HQGO
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

VMAX
3.7%
HQGO
3.9%

Basic Materials

VMAX
2.8%
HQGO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMAX vs. HQGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMAX
VMAX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

HQGO
HQGO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
HQGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HQGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
HQGO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
HQGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
HQGO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMAX vs. HQGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) and Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMAXHQGODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.25

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.08

1.92

+4.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.32

7.51

+13.81

VMAX vs. HQGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the HQGO Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMAX and HQGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMAX vs. HQGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMAX drawdown since its inception was -19.05%, smaller than the maximum HQGO drawdown of -20.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMAX and HQGO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMAXHQGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.05%

-20.85%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.93%

-10.40%

+5.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.53%

+4.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-2.54%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

2.65%

-1.25%

Volatility

VMAX vs. HQGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) is 3.22%, while Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that VMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HQGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMAXHQGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

5.05%

-1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

10.73%

-1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

13.89%

-1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.39%

17.05%

-1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.39%

17.05%

-1.66%

VMAX vs. HQGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMAX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than HQGO's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMAX vs. HQGO - Dividend Comparison

VMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than HQGO's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
HQGO
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
0.47%0.51%0.52%
VMAX
Hartford US Value ETF
1.86%2.14%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMAX and HQGO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HQGO has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to VMAX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMAX dropped -19.05% vs HQGO's -20.85%.

On 1-year performance, VMAX leads with 29.83% vs 19.84% for HQGO. On fees, VMAX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, VMAX has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VMAX has performed better with a 29.83% return vs 19.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VMAX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for HQGO.

VMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.47% for HQGO.

VMAX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HQGO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VMAX and 0.34% for HQGO.

VMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMAX and HQGO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer