VLXVX vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

VLXVX (Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Fund) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both funds - VLXVX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Vanguard, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, VLXVX returned 10.11%/yr vs 16.79%/yr for QQQM. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VLXVX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

VLXVX vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Fund (VLXVX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLXVX achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 14.96% return.

VLXVX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 11.69%
• 6M: 12.27%
• 1Y: 27.67%
• 3Y*: 19.61%
• 5Y*: 10.11%
• 10Y*: —

QQQM

• 1D: -4.78%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 14.96%
• 6M: 13.04%
• 1Y: 35.13%
• 3Y*: 26.56%
• 5Y*: 16.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLXVX vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
VLXVX Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Fund	11.69%	21.44%	14.37%	20.40%	-17.41%	16.46%	9.70%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	14.96%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between VLXVX and QQQM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020	0.87

The correlation between VLXVX and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

VLXVX vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VLXVX	QQQM
Technology	27.3%	53.8%
Financial Services	16.1%	0.2%
Industrials	12.4%	2.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	12.3%
Healthcare	8.3%	4.2%
Communication Services	8.0%	15.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	7.7%
Energy	4.3%	0.6%
Basic Materials	4.3%	1.1%
Utilities	2.7%	1.4%
Real Estate	2.5%	0.1%

Return for Risk

VLXVX vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLXVX

VLXVX Risk / Return Rank: 70
VLXVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
VLXVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VLXVX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VLXVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
VLXVX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 62
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 63
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLXVX vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Fund (VLXVX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VLXVX	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.12	+0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	2.73	+0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.37	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	2.95	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.65	11.24	+2.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VLXVX vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLXVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLXVX and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VLXVX	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	2.12	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.75	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.79	-0.07

Drawdowns

VLXVX vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLXVX drawdown since its inception was -31.42%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLXVX and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	VLXVX	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.42%	-35.04%	+3.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	-11.96%	+3.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.53%	-22.70%	+8.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.37%	-35.04%	+9.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-5.49%	+5.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-8.24%	+3.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	3.13%	-1.12%

Volatility

VLXVX vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Fund (VLXVX) is 3.39%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that VLXVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VLXVX	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.39%	6.68%	-3.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.11%	13.07%	-3.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.44%	16.66%	-5.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.19%	22.33%	-8.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.69%	22.20%	-6.51%

VLXVX vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLXVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VLXVX vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

VLXVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than QQQM's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.44%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VLXVX Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Fund	1.79%	2.00%	2.11%	2.06%	2.00%	1.93%	1.60%	1.90%	1.85%	0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VLXVX and QQQM in my portfolio?

VLXVX and QQQM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VLXVX or QQQM?

QQQM has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to VLXVX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLXVX dropped -31.42% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VLXVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.