PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLXVX vs. DFIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLXVX vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Fund (VLXVX) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLXVX achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly higher than DFIV's 9.75% return.


VLXVX

1D
0.29%
1M
2.03%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.27%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*

DFIV

1D
-2.25%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
9.75%
6M
13.52%
1Y
32.62%
3Y*
23.03%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLXVX vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VLXVX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Fund
11.69%21.44%14.37%20.40%-17.41%1.99%
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
9.75%45.36%7.26%17.75%-3.70%0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VLXVX and DFIV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021

0.80

The correlation between VLXVX and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

VLXVX vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VLXVX
DFIV

Technology

27.3%
2.8%

Financial Services

16.1%
32.4%

Industrials

12.4%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
9.6%

Healthcare

8.3%
4.9%

Communication Services

8.0%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.9%

Energy

4.3%
16.4%

Basic Materials

4.3%
10.9%

Utilities

2.7%
2.5%

Real Estate

2.5%
1.8%

Technology

VLXVX
27.3%
DFIV
2.8%

Financial Services

VLXVX
16.1%
DFIV
32.4%

Industrials

VLXVX
12.4%
DFIV
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VLXVX
9.4%
DFIV
9.6%

Healthcare

VLXVX
8.3%
DFIV
4.9%

Communication Services

VLXVX
8.0%
DFIV
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

VLXVX
4.8%
DFIV
4.9%

Energy

VLXVX
4.3%
DFIV
16.4%

Basic Materials

VLXVX
4.3%
DFIV
10.9%

Utilities

VLXVX
2.7%
DFIV
2.5%

Real Estate

VLXVX
2.5%
DFIV
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLXVX vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLXVX
VLXVX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VLXVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLXVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLXVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VLXVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLXVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

DFIV
DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLXVX vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Fund (VLXVX) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VLXVXDFIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.39

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.65

13.09

+0.56

VLXVX vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLXVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLXVX and DFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VLXVXDFIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.36

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.91

-0.18

Drawdowns

VLXVX vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLXVX drawdown since its inception was -31.42%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLXVX and DFIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLXVXDFIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.42%

-25.42%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-9.66%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.53%

-14.72%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-2.60%

+2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-4.48%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.50%

-0.49%

Volatility

VLXVX vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Fund (VLXVX) is 3.39%, while Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that VLXVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLXVXDFIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

4.14%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.11%

11.26%

-2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.44%

13.88%

-2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.19%

16.66%

-2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

16.66%

-0.97%

VLXVX vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLXVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VLXVX vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

VLXVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than DFIV's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
2.60%2.92%3.88%3.93%3.84%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VLXVX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2065 Fund
1.79%2.00%2.11%2.06%2.00%1.93%1.60%1.90%1.85%0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


VLXVX and DFIV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFIV has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to VLXVX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLXVX dropped -31.42% vs DFIV's -25.42%.

VLXVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLXVX and DFIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer