VLUE vs. SIZE
VLUE (iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) and SIZE (iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VLUE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index, while SIZE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Low Size Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VLUE returned 15.97%/yr vs 12.04%/yr for SIZE. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
VLUE vs. SIZE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VLUE achieves a 50.50% return, which is significantly higher than SIZE's 9.23% return. Over the past 10 years, VLUE has outperformed SIZE with an annualized return of 15.97%, while SIZE has yielded a comparatively lower 12.04% annualized return.
VLUE
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- 50.50%
- 6M
- 49.56%
- 1Y
- 89.78%
- 3Y*
- 34.06%
- 5Y*
- 17.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.97%
SIZE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 18.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.04%
VLUE vs. SIZE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 50.50% | 32.67% | 7.25% | 14.26% | -14.17% | 28.93% | -0.23% | 27.20% | -11.13% | 21.95% |
SIZE iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF | 9.23% | 10.51% | 14.37% | 17.78% | -15.86% | 25.05% | 16.26% | 28.97% | -6.59% | 18.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between VLUE and SIZE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.83 |
The correlation between VLUE and SIZE shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VLUE vs. SIZE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VLUE
SIZE
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VLUE
SIZE
Financial Services
VLUE
SIZE
Consumer Cyclical
VLUE
SIZE
Communication Services
VLUE
SIZE
Industrials
VLUE
SIZE
Healthcare
VLUE
SIZE
Consumer Defensive
VLUE
SIZE
Energy
VLUE
SIZE
Utilities
VLUE
SIZE
Real Estate
VLUE
SIZE
Basic Materials
VLUE
SIZE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VLUE vs. SIZE — Risk / Return Rank
VLUE
SIZE
VLUE vs. SIZE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) and iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VLUE | SIZE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.81 | 1.25 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.99 | 2.34 | +7.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 41.99 | 9.07 | +32.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VLUE vs. SIZE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VLUE drawdown since its inception was -39.47%, roughly equal to the maximum SIZE drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLUE and SIZE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VLUE | SIZE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.47% | -39.15% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -7.97% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | -18.71% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.12% | -24.03% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.47% | -39.15% | -0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.21% | +1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.00% | -4.17% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.06% | +0.09% |
Volatility
VLUE vs. SIZE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a higher volatility of 8.92% compared to iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) at 3.85%. This indicates that VLUE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIZE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VLUE | SIZE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.92% | 3.85% | +5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.67% | 9.82% | +5.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.74% | 13.00% | +5.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 17.43% | +0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.96% | 18.72% | +1.24% |
VLUE vs. SIZE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VLUE and SIZE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VLUE vs. SIZE - Dividend Comparison
VLUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than SIZE's 1.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIZE iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.53% | 1.42% | 1.59% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.35% | 2.43% | 1.58% | 1.88% | 1.95% |
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 1.37% | 2.11% | 2.73% | 2.66% | 3.18% | 2.22% | 2.42% | 2.61% | 2.70% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VLUE and SIZE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VLUE has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to SIZE (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLUE dropped -39.47% vs SIZE's -39.15%.
On 10-year performance, VLUE leads with 15.97% vs 12.04% for SIZE. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, SIZE has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 12.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VLUE and SIZE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
SIZE has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 1.37% for VLUE.
VLUE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SIZE is Mid Cap Blend Equities. VLUE tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index, while SIZE tracks MSCI USA Low Size Index.
VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.83 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VLUE and SIZE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer