PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLUE vs. IWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLUE vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLUE achieves a 49.00% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 17.07% return. Over the past 10 years, VLUE has outperformed IWM with an annualized return of 15.43%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.93% annualized return.


VLUE

1D
-0.42%
1M
20.77%
YTD
49.00%
6M
51.40%
1Y
91.45%
3Y*
34.26%
5Y*
16.36%
10Y*
15.43%

IWM

1D
-1.37%
1M
3.52%
YTD
17.07%
6M
15.83%
1Y
39.10%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
10.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLUE vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VLUE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
49.00%32.67%7.25%14.26%-14.17%28.93%-0.23%27.20%-11.13%21.95%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
17.07%12.66%11.38%16.83%-20.48%14.54%20.03%25.39%-11.12%14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between VLUE and IWM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2013

0.82

The correlation between VLUE and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

VLUE vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VLUE
IWM

Technology

44.5%
19.5%

Financial Services

10.4%
15.8%

Healthcare

8.5%
15.8%

Communication Services

8.3%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
7.8%

Industrials

7.4%
17.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
2.1%

Energy

3.2%
6.0%

Utilities

2.0%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
5.7%

Basic Materials

1.6%
4.5%

Technology

VLUE
44.5%
IWM
19.5%

Financial Services

VLUE
10.4%
IWM
15.8%

Healthcare

VLUE
8.5%
IWM
15.8%

Communication Services

VLUE
8.3%
IWM
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VLUE
8.3%
IWM
7.8%

Industrials

VLUE
7.4%
IWM
17.1%

Consumer Defensive

VLUE
4.0%
IWM
2.1%

Energy

VLUE
3.2%
IWM
6.0%

Utilities

VLUE
2.0%
IWM
3.0%

Real Estate

VLUE
1.8%
IWM
5.7%

Basic Materials

VLUE
1.6%
IWM
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLUE vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLUE
VLUE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
VLUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLUE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
VLUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLUE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLUE vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VLUEIWMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.32

2.05

+3.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.86

2.85

+4.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.91

1.34

+0.57

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.17

3.56

+6.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

45.62

12.64

+32.97

VLUE vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLUE Sharpe Ratio is 5.32, which is higher than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLUE and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VLUEIWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.32

2.05

+3.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.27

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.48

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.37

+0.40

Drawdowns

VLUE vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLUE drawdown since its inception was -39.47%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLUE and IWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLUEIWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.47%

-59.05%

+19.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-11.03%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.89%

-27.50%

+9.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.12%

-31.91%

+4.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.47%

-41.13%

+1.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-1.49%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-10.77%

+4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

3.10%

-1.09%

Volatility

VLUE vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a higher volatility of 8.03% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 5.75%. This indicates that VLUE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLUEIWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.03%

5.75%

+2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.96%

13.53%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.30%

19.20%

-1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.78%

22.52%

-4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.82%

23.04%

-3.22%

VLUE vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLUE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VLUE vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

VLUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than IWM's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.88%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%
VLUE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
1.40%2.11%2.73%2.66%3.18%2.22%2.42%2.61%2.70%2.14%2.07%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


VLUE and IWM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLUE has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to IWM (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLUE dropped -39.47% vs IWM's -59.05%.

On 10-year performance, VLUE leads with 15.43% vs 10.93% for IWM. On fees, VLUE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IWM has been the lower-risk option at 5.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 15.43% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VLUE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWM.

VLUE has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.88% for IWM.

VLUE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. VLUE tracks MSCI USA Value Weighted Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VLUE and 0.19% for IWM.

VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.32 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLUE and IWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer