PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLUE vs. FUNL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLUE vs. FUNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLUE achieves a 49.00% return, which is significantly higher than FUNL's 5.66% return.


VLUE

1D
-0.42%
1M
20.77%
YTD
49.00%
6M
51.40%
1Y
91.45%
3Y*
34.26%
5Y*
16.36%
10Y*
15.43%

FUNL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.66%
6M
7.22%
1Y
18.97%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLUE vs. FUNL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VLUE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
49.00%32.67%7.25%14.26%-14.17%28.93%17.75%
FUNL
CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL
5.66%14.62%15.55%14.33%-5.76%25.93%14.92%

Correlation

The correlation between VLUE and FUNL is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2020

0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between VLUE and FUNL has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VLUE vs. FUNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VLUE
FUNL

Technology

44.5%
14.6%

Financial Services

10.4%
19.3%

Healthcare

8.5%
15.3%

Communication Services

8.3%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
6.5%

Industrials

7.4%
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
7.0%

Energy

3.2%
7.6%

Utilities

2.0%
5.0%

Real Estate

1.8%
4.5%

Basic Materials

1.6%
2.2%

Technology

VLUE
44.5%
FUNL
14.6%

Financial Services

VLUE
10.4%
FUNL
19.3%

Healthcare

VLUE
8.5%
FUNL
15.3%

Communication Services

VLUE
8.3%
FUNL
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VLUE
8.3%
FUNL
6.5%

Industrials

VLUE
7.4%
FUNL
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

VLUE
4.0%
FUNL
7.0%

Energy

VLUE
3.2%
FUNL
7.6%

Utilities

VLUE
2.0%
FUNL
5.0%

Real Estate

VLUE
1.8%
FUNL
4.5%

Basic Materials

VLUE
1.6%
FUNL
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLUE vs. FUNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLUE
VLUE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
VLUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLUE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
VLUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLUE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FUNL
FUNL Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FUNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUNL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FUNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUNL Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLUE vs. FUNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VLUEFUNLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.91

1.47

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.17

5.01

+5.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

45.62

23.31

+22.31

VLUE vs. FUNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLUE Sharpe Ratio is 5.32, which is higher than the FUNL Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLUE and FUNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VLUEFUNLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.32

2.19

+3.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.63

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.95

-0.19

Drawdowns

VLUE vs. FUNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLUE drawdown since its inception was -39.47%, which is greater than FUNL's maximum drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLUE and FUNL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLUEFUNLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.47%

-19.35%

-20.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-3.83%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.89%

-17.37%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.12%

-19.35%

-7.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.12%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-3.54%

-2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

0.82%

+1.19%

Volatility

VLUE vs. FUNL - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a higher volatility of 8.03% compared to CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) at 0.00%. This indicates that VLUE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLUEFUNLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.03%

0.00%

+8.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.96%

5.24%

+8.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.30%

8.82%

+8.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.78%

15.16%

+2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.82%

15.29%

+4.53%

VLUE vs. FUNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLUE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FUNL's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

VLUE vs. FUNL - Dividend Comparison

VLUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than FUNL's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUNL
CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL
2.25%2.10%1.78%1.69%1.84%1.55%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VLUE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
1.40%2.11%2.73%2.66%3.18%2.22%2.42%2.61%2.70%2.14%2.07%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


VLUE and FUNL have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLUE has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to FUNL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLUE dropped -39.47% vs FUNL's -19.35%.

On 5-year performance, VLUE leads with 16.36% vs 9.42% for FUNL. On fees, VLUE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FUNL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 16.36% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VLUE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FUNL.

FUNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 1.40% for VLUE.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and CornerCap. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VLUE and 0.50% for FUNL.

VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.32 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLUE and FUNL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer