PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLUE vs. FLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLUE vs. FLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLUE achieves a 45.72% return, which is significantly lower than FLTW's 65.68% return.


VLUE

1D
0.40%
1M
7.90%
YTD
45.72%
6M
46.53%
1Y
83.16%
3Y*
31.47%
5Y*
16.01%
10Y*
15.38%

FLTW

1D
0.59%
1M
9.23%
YTD
65.68%
6M
71.97%
1Y
100.51%
3Y*
39.63%
5Y*
20.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLUE vs. FLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
45.72%32.67%7.25%14.26%-14.17%28.93%-0.23%27.20%-11.13%5.22%
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
65.68%32.00%16.68%30.05%-27.51%29.46%29.77%31.23%-9.32%-1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between VLUE and FLTW is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.57

The correlation between VLUE and FLTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

VLUE vs. FLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VLUE
FLTW

Technology

44.5%
75.6%

Financial Services

10.4%
12.6%

Healthcare

8.5%
0.6%

Communication Services

8.3%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
1.7%

Industrials

7.4%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
0.9%

Energy

3.2%
0.1%

Utilities

2.0%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%
2.9%

Technology

VLUE
44.5%
FLTW
75.6%

Financial Services

VLUE
10.4%
FLTW
12.6%

Healthcare

VLUE
8.5%
FLTW
0.6%

Communication Services

VLUE
8.3%
FLTW
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VLUE
8.3%
FLTW
1.7%

Industrials

VLUE
7.4%
FLTW
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

VLUE
4.0%
FLTW
0.9%

Energy

VLUE
3.2%
FLTW
0.1%

Utilities

VLUE
2.0%
FLTW

-

Real Estate

VLUE
1.8%
FLTW

-

Basic Materials

VLUE
1.6%
FLTW
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLUE vs. FLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLUE
VLUE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
VLUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLUE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
VLUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLUE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FLTW
FLTW Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLUE vs. FLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VLUEFLTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.58

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.25

9.29

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

39.16

27.95

+11.21

VLUE vs. FLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLUE Sharpe Ratio is 4.55, which is comparable to the FLTW Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLUE and FLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VLUE vs. FLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLUE drawdown since its inception was -39.47%, roughly equal to the maximum FLTW drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLUE and FLTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLUEFLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.47%

-38.00%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-10.87%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.89%

-26.45%

+8.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.12%

-38.00%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-4.47%

+1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-8.42%

+2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

3.61%

-1.48%

Volatility

VLUE vs. FLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) is 8.83%, while Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) has a volatility of 15.27%. This indicates that VLUE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLUEFLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.83%

15.27%

-6.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.31%

23.85%

-8.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.38%

27.98%

-9.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.00%

22.90%

-4.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

22.03%

-2.12%

VLUE vs. FLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLUE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FLTW's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VLUE vs. FLTW - Dividend Comparison

VLUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than FLTW's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
1.51%2.51%1.89%2.85%3.16%2.31%2.14%3.00%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
1.43%2.11%2.73%2.66%3.18%2.22%2.42%2.61%2.70%2.14%2.07%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


VLUE and FLTW have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLTW has higher volatility (15.27%) compared to VLUE (8.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLUE dropped -39.47% vs FLTW's -38.00%.

On 5-year performance, FLTW leads with 20.89% vs 16.01% for VLUE. On fees, VLUE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, VLUE has been the lower-risk option at 8.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLTW has performed better with a 20.89% return vs 16.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VLUE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLTW.

FLTW has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.43% for VLUE.

VLUE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FLTW is Asia Pacific Equities. VLUE tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index, while FLTW tracks FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VLUE and 0.19% for FLTW.

VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.55 vs 3.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLUE and FLTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer