VLUE vs. FFLV
VLUE (iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) and FFLV (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. VLUE is passively managed, while FFLV is actively managed. Over the past year, VLUE returned 91.45% vs 27.22% for FFLV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VLUE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FFLV.
Performance
VLUE vs. FFLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VLUE achieves a 49.00% return, which is significantly higher than FFLV's 11.22% return.
VLUE
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 20.77%
- YTD
- 49.00%
- 6M
- 51.40%
- 1Y
- 91.45%
- 3Y*
- 34.26%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 15.43%
FFLV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- 11.22%
- 6M
- 12.86%
- 1Y
- 27.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VLUE vs. FFLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VLUE iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 49.00% | 32.67% | 6.38% |
FFLV Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF | 11.22% | 16.04% | 8.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between VLUE and FFLV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024 | 0.86 |
The correlation between VLUE and FFLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VLUE vs. FFLV — Risk / Return Rank
VLUE
FFLV
VLUE vs. FFLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VLUE | FFLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.32 | 2.41 | +2.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.86 | 3.48 | +3.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.91 | 1.43 | +0.48 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.17 | 3.78 | +6.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 45.62 | 14.71 | +30.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VLUE | FFLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.32 | 2.41 | +2.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 1.12 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
VLUE vs. FFLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VLUE drawdown since its inception was -39.47%, which is greater than FFLV's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLUE and FFLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VLUE | FFLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.47% | -16.71% | -22.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -7.24% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.27% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.01% | -3.00% | -3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 1.86% | +0.15% |
Volatility
VLUE vs. FFLV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a higher volatility of 8.03% compared to Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) at 2.79%. This indicates that VLUE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VLUE | FFLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.03% | 2.79% | +5.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.96% | 8.40% | +5.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.30% | 11.38% | +5.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 14.22% | +3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.82% | 14.22% | +5.60% |
VLUE vs. FFLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VLUE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FFLV's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
VLUE vs. FFLV - Dividend Comparison
VLUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than FFLV's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFLV Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF | 1.46% | 1.60% | 1.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VLUE iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 1.40% | 2.11% | 2.73% | 2.66% | 3.18% | 2.22% | 2.42% | 2.61% | 2.70% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VLUE and FFLV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VLUE has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to FFLV (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLUE dropped -39.47% vs FFLV's -16.71%.
On 1-year performance, VLUE leads with 91.45% vs 27.22% for FFLV. On fees, VLUE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FFLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 91.45% return vs 27.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VLUE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FFLV.
FFLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 1.40% for VLUE.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VLUE and 0.38% for FFLV.
VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.32 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VLUE and FFLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer