VLU vs. INCE
VLU (SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF) and INCE (Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VLU is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 1500 Low Valuation Tilt Index, while INCE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. VLU is passively managed, while INCE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VLU returned 13.37%/yr vs 10.75%/yr for INCE. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VLU charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for INCE.
Performance
VLU vs. INCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VLU achieves a 19.00% return, which is significantly higher than INCE's 16.43% return.
VLU
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- YTD
- 19.00%
- 1Y
- 31.34%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- 14.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.95%
INCE
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 16.43%
- 1Y
- 26.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.75%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.28M | $6.86M | $3.18M | |
| $1.43M | $1.32M | $1.58M |
VLU vs. INCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLU SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF | 19.00% | 16.70% | 17.24% | 17.18% | -8.24% | 30.95% | 9.91% | 26.20% | -7.89% | 18.16% |
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 16.43% | 15.92% | 10.70% | 13.87% | -8.54% | 23.36% | 12.33% | 32.72% | -2.14% | 19.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between VLU and INCE is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.77 |
The correlation between VLU and INCE shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VLU vs. INCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VLU
INCE
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
VLU
INCE
Technology
VLU
INCE
Healthcare
VLU
INCE
Consumer Cyclical
VLU
INCE
Industrials
VLU
INCE
Communication Services
VLU
INCE
Consumer Defensive
VLU
INCE
Energy
VLU
INCE
Utilities
VLU
INCE
Real Estate
VLU
INCE
-
Basic Materials
VLU
INCE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VLU vs. INCE — Risk / Return Rank
VLU
INCE
VLU vs. INCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VLU | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.61 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.97 | 5.49 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.62 | 21.17 | -0.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VLU vs. INCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VLU drawdown since its inception was -37.39%, which is greater than INCE's maximum drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLU and INCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VLU | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.39% | -33.95% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.34% | -4.90% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.22% | -14.01% | -2.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.55% | -18.40% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -3.21% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | 1.27% | +0.25% |
Volatility
VLU vs. INCE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF (VLU) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) at 2.41%. This indicates that VLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VLU | INCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 2.41% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.71% | 6.17% | +1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.80% | 8.34% | +2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.30% | 13.26% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 15.59% | +2.39% |
VLU vs. INCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VLU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than INCE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
VLU vs. INCE - Dividend Comparison
VLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than INCE's 4.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 4.78% | 4.71% | 3.25% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.44% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
VLU SPDR S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF | 1.56% | 1.82% | 2.00% | 2.02% | 2.16% | 1.86% | 1.98% | 2.19% | 2.57% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 6.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VLU and INCE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VLU has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to INCE (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLU dropped -37.39% vs INCE's -33.95%.
On 5-year performance, VLU leads with 13.37% vs 10.75% for INCE. On fees, VLU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VLU has performed better with a 13.37% return vs 10.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VLU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for INCE.
INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 1.56% for VLU.
VLU is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while INCE is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VLU and 0.29% for INCE.
INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 2.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VLU and INCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer