VLLU vs. SCHV

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

VLLU (Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - VLLU tracks the Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value Index while SCHV tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VLLU returned 22.62% vs 24.62% for SCHV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VLLU charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.

Performance

VLLU vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF (VLLU) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLLU achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 16.63% return.

VLLU

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -0.42%
• 6M: 9.16%
• YTD: 11.45%
• 1Y: 22.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHV

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -0.27%
• 6M: 12.60%
• YTD: 16.63%
• 1Y: 24.62%
• 3Y*: 17.58%
• 5Y*: 10.87%
• 10Y*: 11.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLLU vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VLLU Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF	11.45%	17.35%	1.89%
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	16.63%	16.02%	0.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VLLU and SCHV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024	0.92

The correlation between VLLU and SCHV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

VLLU vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VLLU	SCHV
Technology	26.6%	22.5%
Financial Services	22.2%	18.6%
Healthcare	13.1%	10.9%
Industrials	9.8%	13.6%
Energy	7.3%	6.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	6.6%
Communication Services	5.0%	2.4%
Basic Materials	3.7%	2.7%
Utilities	0.6%	4.2%
Real Estate	-	3.9%

Return for Risk

VLLU vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLLU

VLLU Risk / Return Rank: 81
VLLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
VLLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
VLLU Omega Ratio Rank: 75
VLLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
VLLU Martin Ratio Rank: 83

SCHV

SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 85
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 83
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLLU vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF (VLLU) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VLLU	SCHV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	2.20	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	3.14	-0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.39	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.59	3.62	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.06	14.40	-1.34

VLLU vs. SCHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the SCHV Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLLU and SCHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VLLU vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLLU drawdown since its inception was -16.62%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLLU and SCHV.

Drawdown Indicators

	VLLU	SCHV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.62%	-37.08%	+20.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.33%	-6.83%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.78%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-1.78%	+0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.37%	-3.81%	+1.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	1.71%	+0.03%

Volatility

VLLU vs. SCHV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF (VLLU) is 3.46%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that VLLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VLLU	SCHV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.46%	4.06%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.50%	8.83%	-0.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.33%	11.26%	+0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.72%	14.55%	+0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.72%	16.92%	-2.20%

VLLU vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLLU has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VLLU vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison

VLLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than SCHV's 1.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	1.78%	2.02%	2.25%	2.42%	2.37%	1.93%	3.03%	3.02%	3.05%	2.37%	2.65%	2.69%
VLLU Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF	1.36%	1.52%	0.90%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VLLU and SCHV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, VLLU and SCHV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, VLLU or SCHV?

SCHV has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to VLLU (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLLU dropped -16.62% vs SCHV's -37.08%.

Which ETF is better, VLLU or SCHV?

On 1-year performance, SCHV leads with 24.62% vs 22.62% for VLLU. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VLLU has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VLLU or SCHV?

Over the 1-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 24.62% return vs 22.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VLLU or SCHV?

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for VLLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VLLU or SCHV?

SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 1.36% for VLLU.

What is the main difference between VLLU and SCHV?

VLLU tracks Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value Index, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VLLU and 0.04% for SCHV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.