PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLCGX vs. VCGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLCGX vs. VCGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VALIC Company I Large Capital Growth Fund (VLCGX) and VALIC Company I Systematic Core Fund (VCGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLCGX achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly higher than VCGAX's 7.11% return. Over the past 10 years, VLCGX has underperformed VCGAX with an annualized return of 11.51%, while VCGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.43% annualized return.


VLCGX

1D
0.17%
1M
5.00%
YTD
9.13%
6M
8.89%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
6.71%
5Y*
4.95%
10Y*
11.51%

VCGAX

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.53%
YTD
7.11%
6M
7.31%
1Y
21.70%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
13.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLCGX vs. VCGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VLCGX
VALIC Company I Large Capital Growth Fund
9.13%-13.56%16.33%23.73%-18.84%26.09%23.00%39.89%-4.04%28.56%
VCGAX
VALIC Company I Systematic Core Fund
7.11%9.41%23.14%23.94%-18.71%26.34%24.07%30.50%-8.98%21.09%

Correlation

The correlation between VLCGX and VCGAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2004

0.94

The correlation between VLCGX and VCGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLCGX vs. VCGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLCGX
VLCGX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
VLCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
VLCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VCGAX
VCGAX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
VCGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
VCGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLCGX vs. VCGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VALIC Company I Large Capital Growth Fund (VLCGX) and VALIC Company I Systematic Core Fund (VCGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VLCGXVCGAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

1.98

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.46

2.85

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

2.38

-0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.80

10.28

-1.48

VLCGX vs. VCGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the VCGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLCGX and VCGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VLCGXVCGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.98

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.61

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.73

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.24

+0.06

Drawdowns

VLCGX vs. VCGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLCGX drawdown since its inception was -52.12%, smaller than the maximum VCGAX drawdown of -71.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLCGX and VCGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLCGXVCGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.12%

-71.37%

+19.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-9.55%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.01%

-22.35%

-13.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-24.90%

-11.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

-34.41%

-1.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.35%

-0.13%

-9.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.95%

-25.26%

+14.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

2.21%

+0.17%

Volatility

VLCGX vs. VCGAX - Volatility Comparison

VALIC Company I Large Capital Growth Fund (VLCGX) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to VALIC Company I Systematic Core Fund (VCGAX) at 2.79%. This indicates that VLCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLCGXVCGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

2.79%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

8.79%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

11.52%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.54%

16.91%

+3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.25%

18.39%

+1.86%

VLCGX vs. VCGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLCGX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than VCGAX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

VLCGX vs. VCGAX - Dividend Comparison

VLCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.57%, more than VCGAX's 6.33% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCGAX
VALIC Company I Systematic Core Fund
6.33%0.00%1.69%4.83%0.79%9.20%10.09%10.41%1.01%3.82%
VLCGX
VALIC Company I Large Capital Growth Fund
9.57%0.00%6.08%9.19%13.16%8.61%6.80%6.20%0.63%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, VLCGX and VCGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VLCGX has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to VCGAX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLCGX dropped -52.12% vs VCGAX's -71.37%.

VCGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLCGX and VCGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer