PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCGAX vs. VCBCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCGAX vs. VCBCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VALIC Company I Systematic Core Fund (VCGAX) and VALIC Company I Blue Chip Growth Fund (VCBCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VCGAX having a 7.25% return and VCBCX slightly lower at 7.16%. Over the past 10 years, VCGAX has underperformed VCBCX with an annualized return of 13.45%, while VCBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.48% annualized return.


VCGAX

1D
0.24%
1M
3.15%
YTD
7.25%
6M
7.71%
1Y
22.72%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
13.45%

VCBCX

1D
0.70%
1M
5.76%
YTD
7.16%
6M
6.66%
1Y
26.60%
3Y*
21.37%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
14.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCGAX vs. VCBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCGAX
VALIC Company I Systematic Core Fund
7.25%9.41%23.14%23.94%-18.71%26.34%24.07%30.50%-8.98%21.09%
VCBCX
VALIC Company I Blue Chip Growth Fund
7.16%7.70%34.71%44.42%-38.26%16.36%35.27%29.63%-3.72%36.31%

Correlation

The correlation between VCGAX and VCBCX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2000

0.93

The correlation between VCGAX and VCBCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCGAX vs. VCBCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCGAX
VCGAX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VCGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VCGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VCBCX
VCBCX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
VCBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
VCBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCGAX vs. VCBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VALIC Company I Systematic Core Fund (VCGAX) and VALIC Company I Blue Chip Growth Fund (VCBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCGAXVCBCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.02

1.86

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.90

2.56

+0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

1.71

+0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.58

5.91

+4.67

VCGAX vs. VCBCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCGAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the VCBCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCGAX and VCBCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCGAXVCBCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.86

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.37

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.64

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.33

-0.08

Drawdowns

VCGAX vs. VCBCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCGAX drawdown since its inception was -71.37%, which is greater than VCBCX's maximum drawdown of -55.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCGAX and VCBCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCGAXVCBCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.37%

-55.01%

-16.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.55%

-15.94%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.35%

-29.70%

+7.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.90%

-43.31%

+18.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.41%

-43.31%

+8.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.26%

-13.48%

-11.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

4.61%

-2.40%

Volatility

VCGAX vs. VCBCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VALIC Company I Systematic Core Fund (VCGAX) is 2.77%, while VALIC Company I Blue Chip Growth Fund (VCBCX) has a volatility of 3.11%. This indicates that VCGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCGAXVCBCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

3.11%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

11.42%

-2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.54%

14.95%

-3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

23.88%

-6.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

22.77%

-4.38%

VCGAX vs. VCBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCGAX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than VCBCX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

VCGAX vs. VCBCX - Dividend Comparison

VCGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, less than VCBCX's 13.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCBCX
VALIC Company I Blue Chip Growth Fund
13.66%0.00%10.23%16.65%25.75%8.99%8.63%11.48%0.07%8.44%
VCGAX
VALIC Company I Systematic Core Fund
6.32%0.00%1.69%4.83%0.79%9.20%10.09%10.41%1.01%3.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCGAX and VCBCX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCBCX has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to VCGAX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCGAX dropped -71.37% vs VCBCX's -55.01%.

VCGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCGAX and VCBCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer