VLAAX vs. ABIEX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

VLAAX (Value Line Asset Allocation Fund) and ABIEX (AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, VLAAX returned 7.04%/yr vs 7.26%/yr for ABIEX. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VLAAX charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ABIEX.

Performance

VLAAX vs. ABIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) and AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio (ABIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLAAX achieves a -3.92% return, which is significantly lower than ABIEX's 15.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VLAAX having a 7.04% annualized return and ABIEX not far ahead at 7.26%.

VLAAX

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: -0.65%
• 6M: -2.34%
• YTD: -3.92%
• 1Y: -9.23%
• 3Y*: 3.51%
• 5Y*: 1.77%
• 10Y*: 7.04%
• ALL TIME*: 8.80%

ABIEX

• 1D: 3.11%
• 1M: -2.52%
• 6M: 7.03%
• YTD: 15.45%
• 1Y: 29.63%
• 3Y*: 19.43%
• 5Y*: 7.36%
• 10Y*: 7.26%
• ALL TIME*: 5.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ABIEX AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VLAAX Value Line Asset Allocation Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

VLAAX vs. ABIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VLAAX Value Line Asset Allocation Fund	-3.92%	-2.61%	9.36%	21.52%	-15.70%	11.77%	15.24%	25.40%	2.00%	14.94%
ABIEX AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio	15.45%	24.71%	14.27%	16.88%	-22.59%	-1.08%	13.83%	18.39%	-13.90%	20.71%

Correlation

The correlation between VLAAX and ABIEX is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2011	0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between VLAAX and ABIEX has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

VLAAX vs. ABIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VLAAX

VLAAX Risk / Return Rank: 0
VLAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
VLAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
VLAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
VLAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
VLAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

ABIEX

ABIEX Risk / Return Rank: 62
ABIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ABIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
ABIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
ABIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
ABIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VLAAX vs. ABIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) and AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio (ABIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VLAAX	ABIEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.07	1.51	-2.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.43	1.99	-3.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.30	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	2.49	-3.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.16	8.06	-9.22

VLAAX vs. ABIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLAAX Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the ABIEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLAAX and ABIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VLAAX vs. ABIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLAAX drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, which is greater than ABIEX's maximum drawdown of -38.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLAAX and ABIEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VLAAX	ABIEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.95%	-38.56%	-5.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.99%	-11.19%	-2.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.28%	-11.99%	-8.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.26%	-36.34%	+14.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.89%	-38.56%	+14.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.01%	-8.00%	-9.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.94%	-9.99%	+3.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.65%	3.44%	+5.21%

Volatility

VLAAX vs. ABIEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) is 3.41%, while AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio (ABIEX) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that VLAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VLAAX	ABIEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.41%	7.76%	-4.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.27%	17.02%	-9.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.42%	18.45%	-9.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.71%	13.95%	-0.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.93%	13.74%	-0.81%

VLAAX vs. ABIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VLAAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than ABIEX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

VLAAX vs. ABIEX - Dividend Comparison

VLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.72%, more than ABIEX's 2.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABIEX AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio	2.79%	3.50%	5.39%	6.16%	3.85%	3.63%	2.35%	5.31%	6.00%	3.80%	4.63%	4.11%
VLAAX Value Line Asset Allocation Fund	12.72%	12.22%	10.14%	9.88%	6.00%	6.43%	0.53%	1.74%	3.09%	4.34%	2.38%	2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VLAAX and ABIEX in my portfolio?

VLAAX and ABIEX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VLAAX or ABIEX?

ABIEX has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to VLAAX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLAAX dropped -43.95% vs ABIEX's -38.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.