ABIEX vs. AWF

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ABIEX (AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio) and AWF (AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund) are both mutual funds - ABIEX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by AllianceBernstein, while AWF is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, ABIEX returned 7.64%/yr vs 5.41%/yr for AWF. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABIEX charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for AWF.

Performance

ABIEX vs. AWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio (ABIEX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABIEX achieves a 18.83% return, which is significantly higher than AWF's -1.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ABIEX has outperformed AWF with an annualized return of 7.64%, while AWF has yielded a comparatively lower 5.41% annualized return.

ABIEX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -2.92%
• 6M: 13.16%
• YTD: 18.83%
• 1Y: 32.13%
• 3Y*: 21.04%
• 5Y*: 7.48%
• 10Y*: 7.64%

AWF

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: -0.44%
• YTD: -1.22%
• 1Y: -1.11%
• 3Y*: 9.05%
• 5Y*: 4.31%
• 10Y*: 5.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABIEX vs. AWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABIEX AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio	18.83%	24.71%	14.27%	16.88%	-22.59%	-1.08%	13.83%	18.39%	-13.90%	20.71%
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	-1.22%	7.54%	14.30%	18.37%	-16.62%	9.95%	4.40%	23.40%	-11.35%	7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ABIEX and AWF is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2011	0.37

Return for Risk

ABIEX vs. AWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABIEX

ABIEX Risk / Return Rank: 67
ABIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
ABIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
ABIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ABIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
ABIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

AWF

AWF Risk / Return Rank: 2
AWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
AWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
AWF Omega Ratio Rank: 2
AWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABIEX vs. AWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio (ABIEX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABIEX	AWF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	-0.13	+1.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	-0.12	+2.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	0.99	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	-0.11	+3.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.56	-0.24	+10.80

ABIEX vs. AWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the AWF Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABIEX and AWF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ABIEX vs. AWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABIEX drawdown since its inception was -38.56%, smaller than the maximum AWF drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABIEX and AWF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABIEX	AWF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.56%	-55.54%	+16.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.19%	-10.19%	-1.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.99%	-11.12%	-0.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.34%	-25.25%	-11.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.56%	-40.12%	+1.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.30%	-5.34%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.00%	-12.28%	+2.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.06%	4.65%	-1.59%

Volatility

ABIEX vs. AWF - Volatility Comparison

AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio (ABIEX) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) at 2.10%. This indicates that ABIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABIEX	AWF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.54%	2.10%	+5.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.24%	7.48%	+8.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.58%	8.85%	+8.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.78%	12.10%	+1.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.63%	15.18%	-1.55%

ABIEX vs. AWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABIEX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than AWF's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABIEX vs. AWF - Dividend Comparison

ABIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than AWF's 7.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABIEX AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio	2.71%	3.50%	5.39%	6.16%	3.85%	3.63%	2.35%	5.31%	6.00%	3.80%	4.63%	4.11%
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	7.74%	7.81%	7.47%	7.33%	10.30%	6.48%	6.68%	6.62%	7.97%	6.03%	7.73%	10.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABIEX and AWF in my portfolio?

ABIEX and AWF have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABIEX or AWF?

ABIEX has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to AWF (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABIEX dropped -38.56% vs AWF's -55.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.