VIXM vs. VTI
VIXM (ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIXM is a Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIXM returned -11.17%/yr vs 15.05%/yr for VTI. At a correlation of -0.74, they often move in opposite directions. VIXM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
VIXM vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIXM achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, VIXM has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of -11.17%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.05% annualized return.
VIXM
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 6M
- -2.83%
- 1Y
- -8.35%
- 3Y*
- -13.22%
- 5Y*
- -13.49%
- 10Y*
- -11.17%
VTI
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- 28.18%
- 3Y*
- 22.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
VIXM vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIXM ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF | 1.31% | 5.60% | -13.67% | -44.83% | -0.69% | -16.70% | 72.38% | -20.38% | 26.43% | -50.05% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 11.20% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIXM and VTI is -0.68, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2011 | -0.74 |
The correlation between VIXM and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.74 to -0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIXM vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
VIXM
VTI
VIXM vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIXM | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.42 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 3.17 | -3.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 14.62 | -15.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIXM | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 2.33 | -2.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 | 0.73 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.34 | 0.82 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.55 | 0.51 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
VIXM vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIXM drawdown since its inception was -96.23%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIXM and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIXM | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.23% | -55.45% | -40.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.22% | -8.92% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.41% | -19.30% | -22.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.40% | -25.36% | -38.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.72% | -35.00% | -40.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.75% | -0.72% | -95.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.52% | -8.03% | -73.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.74% | 1.93% | +6.81% |
Volatility
VIXM vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.96%. This indicates that VIXM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIXM | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 2.96% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | 9.13% | +4.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 12.17% | +6.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.68% | 17.40% | +13.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.90% | 18.30% | +14.60% |
VIXM vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIXM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIXM vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
VIXM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIXM ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIXM and VTI have a correlation of -0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIXM has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to VTI (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIXM dropped -96.23% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.05% vs -11.17% for VIXM. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.05% return vs -11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for VIXM.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for VIXM.
VIXM is categorized as Volatility, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. VIXM tracks S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for VIXM and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIXM and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer