VIXM vs. SPXN
VIXM (ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF) and SPXN (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIXM is a Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Index, while SPXN is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIXM returned -11.17%/yr vs 16.26%/yr for SPXN. At a correlation of -0.58, they often move in opposite directions. VIXM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPXN.
Performance
VIXM vs. SPXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIXM achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than SPXN's 13.57% return. Over the past 10 years, VIXM has underperformed SPXN with an annualized return of -11.17%, while SPXN has yielded a comparatively higher 16.26% annualized return.
VIXM
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 6M
- -2.83%
- 1Y
- -8.35%
- 3Y*
- -13.22%
- 5Y*
- -13.49%
- 10Y*
- -11.17%
SPXN
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 13.57%
- 6M
- 13.21%
- 1Y
- 32.98%
- 3Y*
- 23.31%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- 16.26%
VIXM vs. SPXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIXM ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF | 1.31% | 5.60% | -13.67% | -44.83% | -0.69% | -16.70% | 72.38% | -20.38% | 26.43% | -50.05% |
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF | 13.57% | 18.74% | 24.35% | 28.57% | -18.87% | 27.04% | 22.15% | 31.50% | -3.85% | 20.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIXM and SPXN is -0.66, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015 | -0.58 |
The correlation between VIXM and SPXN shifts across timeframes, from -0.70 (5 years) to -0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIXM vs. SPXN — Risk / Return Rank
VIXM
SPXN
VIXM vs. SPXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM) and ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIXM | SPXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.47 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 3.58 | -4.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 16.43 | -17.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIXM | SPXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 2.61 | -3.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 | 0.87 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.34 | 0.92 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.55 | 0.92 | -1.47 |
Drawdowns
VIXM vs. SPXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIXM drawdown since its inception was -96.23%, which is greater than SPXN's maximum drawdown of -32.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIXM and SPXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIXM | SPXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.23% | -32.10% | -64.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.22% | -9.26% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.41% | -19.56% | -21.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.40% | -24.47% | -38.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.72% | -32.10% | -43.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.75% | -0.59% | -95.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.52% | -4.00% | -77.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.74% | 2.01% | +6.73% |
Volatility
VIXM vs. SPXN - Volatility Comparison
ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM) and ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) have volatilities of 3.19% and 3.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIXM | SPXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 3.16% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | 9.69% | +4.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 12.70% | +6.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.68% | 17.16% | +13.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.90% | 17.64% | +15.26% |
VIXM vs. SPXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIXM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXN's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIXM vs. SPXN - Dividend Comparison
VIXM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF | 0.87% | 0.98% | 1.12% | 1.19% | 1.35% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 1.41% | 1.76% | 1.54% | 2.60% | 0.52% |
VIXM ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIXM and SPXN have a correlation of -0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIXM has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to SPXN (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIXM dropped -96.23% vs SPXN's -32.10%.
On 10-year performance, SPXN leads with 16.26% vs -11.17% for VIXM. On fees, SPXN is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXN has performed better with a 16.26% return vs -11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXN is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for VIXM.
SPXN has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for VIXM.
VIXM is categorized as Volatility, while SPXN is S&P 500. VIXM tracks S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Index, while SPXN tracks S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for VIXM and 0.09% for SPXN.
SPXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIXM and SPXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer