VIXM vs. SPXN
VIXM (ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF) and SPXN (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIXM is a Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Index, while SPXN is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIXM returned -11.18%/yr vs 15.75%/yr for SPXN. Their -0.58 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. VIXM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPXN.
Performance
VIXM vs. SPXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIXM achieves a -5.57% return, which is significantly lower than SPXN's 14.67% return. Over the past 10 years, VIXM has underperformed SPXN with an annualized return of -11.18%, while SPXN has yielded a comparatively higher 15.75% annualized return.
VIXM
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- -5.57%
- 1Y
- -14.47%
- 3Y*
- -10.95%
- 5Y*
- -14.33%
- 10Y*
- -11.18%
- ALL TIME*
- -18.02%
SPXN
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- 6M
- 12.99%
- YTD
- 14.67%
- 1Y
- 25.50%
- 3Y*
- 21.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.85%
- 10Y*
- 15.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $132.81K | $124.29K | $147.01K | |
| $8.24M | $6.07M | $4.69M |
VIXM vs. SPXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIXM ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF | -5.57% | 5.60% | -13.67% | -44.83% | -0.69% | -16.70% | 72.38% | -20.38% | 26.43% | -50.05% |
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF | 14.67% | 18.74% | 24.35% | 28.57% | -18.87% | 27.04% | 22.15% | 31.50% | -3.85% | 20.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIXM and SPXN is -0.67, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015 | -0.58 |
The correlation between VIXM and SPXN shifts across timeframes, from -0.70 (5 years) to -0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIXM vs. SPXN — Risk / Return Rank
VIXM
SPXN
VIXM vs. SPXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM) and ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIXM | SPXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.32 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 2.77 | -3.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 10.66 | -12.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIXM vs. SPXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIXM drawdown since its inception was -96.23%, which is greater than SPXN's maximum drawdown of -32.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIXM and SPXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIXM | SPXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.23% | -32.10% | -64.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.36% | -9.26% | -10.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.26% | -19.56% | -17.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.40% | -24.47% | -38.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.34% | -32.10% | -40.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.04% | 0.00% | -96.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.65% | -3.98% | -77.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.17% | 2.40% | +7.77% |
Volatility
VIXM vs. SPXN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM) is 3.09%, while ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that VIXM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIXM | SPXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 4.51% | -1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 11.26% | +2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.41% | 14.05% | +4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 17.37% | +13.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.61% | 17.72% | +14.89% |
VIXM vs. SPXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIXM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXN's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIXM vs. SPXN - Dividend Comparison
VIXM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF | 0.88% | 0.98% | 1.12% | 1.19% | 1.35% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 1.41% | 1.76% | 1.54% | 2.60% | 0.52% |
VIXM ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIXM and SPXN have a correlation of -0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXN has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to VIXM (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIXM dropped -96.23% vs SPXN's -32.10%.
On 10-year performance, SPXN leads with 15.75% vs -11.18% for VIXM. On fees, SPXN is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VIXM has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXN has performed better with a 15.75% return vs -11.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXN is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for VIXM.
SPXN has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for VIXM.
VIXM is categorized as Volatility, while SPXN is S&P 500. VIXM tracks S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Index, while SPXN tracks S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for VIXM and 0.09% for SPXN.
SPXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIXM and SPXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer