VITL vs. XAR
VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) is a stock, while XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) is Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. Over the past 5 years, VITL returned -15.28%/yr vs 15.97%/yr for XAR. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VITL vs. XAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VITL achieves a -68.50% return, which is significantly lower than XAR's 12.43% return.
VITL
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 12.53%
- YTD
- -68.50%
- 6M
- -68.29%
- 1Y
- -67.42%
- 3Y*
- -10.77%
- 5Y*
- -15.28%
- 10Y*
- —
XAR
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 16.39%
- 1Y
- 37.23%
- 3Y*
- 32.47%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- 17.82%
VITL vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | -68.50% | -15.26% | 140.22% | 5.16% | -17.39% | -28.64% | -28.22% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 12.43% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 34.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between VITL and XAR is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2020 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VITL and XAR has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VITL vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank
VITL
XAR
VITL vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VITL | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.23 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 2.17 | -2.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 6.13 | -7.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VITL | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.10 | 1.39 | -2.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | 0.68 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.36 | 0.84 | -1.20 |
Drawdowns
VITL vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VITL drawdown since its inception was -84.20%, which is greater than XAR's maximum drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITL and XAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VITL | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.20% | -46.37% | -37.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.20% | -17.22% | -66.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.20% | -19.73% | -64.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.20% | -32.40% | -51.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.81% | -7.35% | -73.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.28% | -6.78% | -40.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.12% | 6.09% | +41.03% |
Volatility
VITL vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison
Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a higher volatility of 18.45% compared to SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) at 9.09%. This indicates that VITL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VITL | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.45% | 9.09% | +9.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.11% | 22.58% | +25.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.49% | 27.05% | +34.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.16% | 23.46% | +30.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.74% | 24.65% | +29.09% |
Dividends
VITL vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison
VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VITL and XAR have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VITL has higher volatility (18.45%) compared to XAR (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITL dropped -84.20% vs XAR's -46.37%.
XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VITL and XAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer