VITL vs. FSMD
VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) is a stock, while FSMD (Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF) is Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. Over the past 5 years, VITL returned -13.31%/yr vs 10.00%/yr for FSMD. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VITL vs. FSMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VITL achieves a -66.81% return, which is significantly lower than FSMD's 17.58% return.
VITL
- 1D
- -3.64%
- 1M
- 25.00%
- YTD
- -66.81%
- 6M
- -69.10%
- 1Y
- -66.51%
- 3Y*
- -8.37%
- 5Y*
- -13.31%
- 10Y*
- —
FSMD
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 6.31%
- YTD
- 17.58%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- 1Y
- 29.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.00%
- 10Y*
- —
VITL vs. FSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | -66.81% | -15.26% | 140.22% | 5.16% | -17.39% | -28.64% | -27.69% |
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 17.58% | 8.70% | 15.18% | 17.37% | -11.15% | 26.40% | 20.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between VITL and FSMD is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020 | 0.30 |
The correlation between VITL and FSMD shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VITL vs. FSMD — Risk / Return Rank
VITL
FSMD
VITL vs. FSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VITL | FSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.31 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 3.30 | -4.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 11.89 | -13.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VITL vs. FSMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VITL drawdown since its inception was -84.20%, which is greater than FSMD's maximum drawdown of -40.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITL and FSMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VITL | FSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.20% | -40.67% | -43.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.20% | -8.44% | -75.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.20% | -22.16% | -62.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.20% | -22.16% | -62.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.77% | 0.00% | -79.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.34% | -5.98% | -41.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.17% | 2.34% | +45.83% |
Volatility
VITL vs. FSMD - Volatility Comparison
Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a higher volatility of 17.37% compared to Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) at 5.14%. This indicates that VITL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VITL | FSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.37% | 5.14% | +12.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.28% | 11.85% | +36.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.63% | 15.69% | +45.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.16% | 18.55% | +35.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.73% | 21.43% | +32.30% |
Dividends
VITL vs. FSMD - Dividend Comparison
VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMD Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.29% | 1.37% | 1.54% | 1.18% | 1.32% | 1.37% |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VITL and FSMD have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VITL has higher volatility (17.37%) compared to FSMD (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITL dropped -84.20% vs FSMD's -40.67%.
FSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VITL and FSMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer