VIS vs. TRBCX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) and TRBCX (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both funds - VIS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while TRBCX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. VIS is passively managed, while TRBCX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIS returned 14.22%/yr vs 17.27%/yr for TRBCX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VIS charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for TRBCX.

Performance

VIS vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIS achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than TRBCX's -0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, VIS has underperformed TRBCX with an annualized return of 14.22%, while TRBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.27% annualized return.

VIS

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 1.53%
• YTD: 15.65%
• 6M: 14.50%
• 1Y: 27.46%
• 3Y*: 21.45%
• 5Y*: 13.11%
• 10Y*: 14.22%

TRBCX

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: -3.52%
• YTD: -0.04%
• 6M: 0.59%
• 1Y: 14.13%
• 3Y*: 26.13%
• 5Y*: 11.91%
• 10Y*: 17.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIS vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF	15.65%	18.57%	16.85%	22.50%	-8.57%	20.80%	12.34%	30.09%	-14.01%	21.47%
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund	-0.04%	18.78%	48.46%	49.42%	-38.57%	17.54%	34.73%	29.97%	2.00%	36.54%

Correlation

The correlation between VIS and TRBCX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004	0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between VIS and TRBCX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

VIS vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIS

VIS Risk / Return Rank: 54
VIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
VIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
VIS Omega Ratio Rank: 50
VIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
VIS Martin Ratio Rank: 60

TRBCX

TRBCX Risk / Return Rank: 14
TRBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
TRBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
TRBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
TRBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
TRBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIS vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VIS	TRBCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	0.83	+0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	1.19	+1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.16	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	0.84	+1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.28	2.80	+6.48

VIS vs. TRBCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the TRBCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIS and TRBCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VIS vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIS drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, which is greater than TRBCX's maximum drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIS and TRBCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VIS	TRBCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.51%	-54.56%	-8.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.29%	-17.01%	+4.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.80%	-23.08%	+2.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.96%	-43.63%	+20.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.42%	-43.63%	+1.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-5.89%	+5.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.37%	-11.30%	+2.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	5.08%	-2.11%

Volatility

VIS vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) at 5.59%. This indicates that VIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VIS	TRBCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.71%	5.59%	+1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.28%	14.14%	+0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.20%	17.24%	-0.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.48%	24.10%	-5.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.48%	22.83%	-2.35%

VIS vs. TRBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than TRBCX's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

VIS vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison

VIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than TRBCX's 5.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund	5.25%	5.25%	18.16%	3.49%	5.87%	9.38%	1.19%	0.36%	2.44%	2.94%	0.67%	3.26%
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF	0.88%	1.01%	1.23%	1.36%	1.52%	1.11%	1.38%	1.68%	1.90%	1.60%	1.81%	1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VIS and TRBCX in my portfolio?

VIS and TRBCX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VIS or TRBCX?

VIS has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to TRBCX (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIS dropped -63.51% vs TRBCX's -54.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.