VIOV vs. ECML
VIOV (Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF) and ECML (EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. VIOV is passively managed, while ECML is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VIOV returned 14.29%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for ECML. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VIOV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ECML.
Performance
VIOV vs. ECML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIOV achieves a 15.28% return, which is significantly higher than ECML's 14.39% return.
VIOV
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 37.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
ECML
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 14.39%
- 6M
- 14.23%
- 1Y
- 26.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIOV vs. ECML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 15.28% | 6.63% | 7.44% | 15.32% |
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF | 14.39% | 6.82% | 2.37% | 24.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIOV and ECML is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | 0.86 |
The correlation between VIOV and ECML has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
VIOV vs. ECML - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIOV
ECML
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
VIOV
ECML
-
Consumer Cyclical
VIOV
ECML
Industrials
VIOV
ECML
Technology
VIOV
ECML
Energy
VIOV
ECML
Real Estate
VIOV
ECML
-
Healthcare
VIOV
ECML
Basic Materials
VIOV
ECML
Consumer Defensive
VIOV
ECML
Communication Services
VIOV
ECML
Utilities
VIOV
ECML
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIOV vs. ECML — Risk / Return Rank
VIOV
ECML
VIOV vs. ECML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) and EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIOV | ECML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.32 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 3.85 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.00 | 11.05 | +1.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIOV | ECML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 1.86 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.86 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
VIOV vs. ECML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIOV drawdown since its inception was -47.36%, which is greater than ECML's maximum drawdown of -24.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOV and ECML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIOV | ECML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.36% | -24.66% | -22.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.33% | -7.01% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.44% | -24.66% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -0.27% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -5.88% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 2.44% | +0.42% |
Volatility
VIOV vs. ECML - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) at 3.84%. This indicates that VIOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIOV | ECML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 3.84% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 9.75% | +1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.41% | 14.56% | +3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 18.39% | +3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.89% | 18.39% | +5.50% |
VIOV vs. ECML - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ECML's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIOV vs. ECML - Dividend Comparison
VIOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than ECML's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF | 1.20% | 1.38% | 0.98% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 1.59% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 2.18% | 1.81% | 1.59% | 1.42% | 1.60% | 1.76% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIOV and ECML have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIOV has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to ECML (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOV dropped -47.36% vs ECML's -24.66%.
On 3-year performance, ECML leads with 15.57% vs 14.29% for VIOV. On fees, VIOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, ECML has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ECML has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 14.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ECML.
VIOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 1.20% for ECML.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Euclidean. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VIOV and 0.95% for ECML.
VIOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIOV and ECML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer