PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIK vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIK vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIK achieves a 49.10% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 14.23% return.


VIK

1D
2.03%
1M
5.74%
6M
40.65%
YTD
49.10%
1Y
84.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
86.33%

QQQ

1D
1.76%
1M
-1.76%
6M
12.07%
YTD
14.23%
1Y
27.00%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
14.45%
10Y*
20.46%
ALL TIME*
10.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$31.40B$28.17B$31.69B
$212.69M$193.67M$273.08M

VIK vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VIK
Viking Holdings Ltd
49.10%62.07%68.49%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
14.23%20.77%20.96%

Correlation

The correlation between VIK and QQQ is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2024

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIK vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VIK
VIK Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VIK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIK Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VIK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIK Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VIK vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VIKQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.25

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.72

2.27

+3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.29

7.21

+8.08

VIK vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIK Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIK and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIK vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIK drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIK and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIKQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.39%

-82.97%

+47.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.94%

-11.96%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.07%

+6.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.86%

-32.61%

+26.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.58%

3.76%

+1.82%

Volatility

VIK vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) have volatilities of 7.02% and 6.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIKQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

6.96%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.67%

16.12%

+15.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.41%

19.37%

+19.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.07%

22.92%

+17.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.07%

22.51%

+17.56%

Dividends

VIK vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

VIK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.43%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
VIK
Viking Holdings Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIK and QQQ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIK has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to QQQ (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIK dropped -35.39% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

VIK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIK and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer