VIG vs. MOAT
VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIG returned 13.05%/yr vs 13.45%/yr for MOAT. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VIG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.
Performance
VIG vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 6.58% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -1.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIG having a 13.05% annualized return and MOAT not far ahead at 13.45%.
VIG
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 6.58%
- 6M
- 6.47%
- 1Y
- 18.31%
- 3Y*
- 16.04%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.05%
MOAT
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- -1.74%
- 6M
- -1.13%
- 1Y
- 13.15%
- 3Y*
- 10.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
VIG vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 6.58% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -1.74% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 24.12% | 14.84% | 34.79% | -1.28% | 23.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIG and MOAT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012 | 0.85 |
The correlation between VIG and MOAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
VIG vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIG
MOAT
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
VIG
MOAT
Financial Services
VIG
MOAT
Healthcare
VIG
MOAT
Industrials
VIG
MOAT
Consumer Defensive
VIG
MOAT
Consumer Cyclical
VIG
MOAT
Energy
VIG
MOAT
-
Basic Materials
VIG
MOAT
-
Utilities
VIG
MOAT
-
Communication Services
VIG
MOAT
Real Estate
VIG
-
MOAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIG vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank
VIG
MOAT
VIG vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIG | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.17 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 1.06 | +1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.37 | 3.29 | +6.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIG | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 0.95 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.43 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.72 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.77 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
VIG vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and MOAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIG | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.81% | -33.31% | -13.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.91% | -12.43% | +4.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -21.44% | +6.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -23.96% | +3.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.72% | -33.31% | +1.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -5.49% | +4.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -3.83% | -1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 4.01% | -2.05% |
Volatility
VIG vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.42%, while VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIG | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 4.01% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 9.90% | -2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.10% | 13.90% | -3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 18.19% | -3.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 18.69% | -2.63% |
VIG vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIG vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than MOAT's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.38% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.48% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIG and MOAT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOAT has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to VIG (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs MOAT's -33.31%.
On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.45% vs 13.05% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 13.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.
VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.38% for MOAT.
VIG is categorized as Dividend, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.47% for MOAT.
VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIG and MOAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer