PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIG vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIG vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 6.58% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -1.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIG having a 13.05% annualized return and MOAT not far ahead at 13.45%.


VIG

1D
0.03%
1M
2.32%
YTD
6.58%
6M
6.47%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
13.05%

MOAT

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.23%
YTD
-1.74%
6M
-1.13%
1Y
13.15%
3Y*
10.81%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
13.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIG vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
6.58%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-1.74%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between VIG and MOAT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012

0.85

The correlation between VIG and MOAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIG vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIG
MOAT

Technology

26.2%
32.8%

Financial Services

20.6%
6.7%

Healthcare

16.5%
16.0%

Industrials

11.8%
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
10.3%

Energy

3.5%

-

Basic Materials

3.5%

-

Utilities

3.2%

-

Communication Services

0.5%
2.4%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Technology

VIG
26.2%
MOAT
32.8%

Financial Services

VIG
20.6%
MOAT
6.7%

Healthcare

VIG
16.5%
MOAT
16.0%

Industrials

VIG
11.8%
MOAT
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

VIG
10.1%
MOAT
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VIG
4.7%
MOAT
10.3%

Energy

VIG
3.5%
MOAT

-

Basic Materials

VIG
3.5%
MOAT

-

Utilities

VIG
3.2%
MOAT

-

Communication Services

VIG
0.5%
MOAT
2.4%

Real Estate

VIG

-

MOAT
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIG vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIG vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIGMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.17

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

1.06

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.37

3.29

+6.09

VIG vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIG and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIGMOATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

0.95

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.43

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.72

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.77

-0.17

Drawdowns

VIG vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIGMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.81%

-33.31%

-13.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-12.43%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-21.44%

+6.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-23.96%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.72%

-33.31%

+1.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-5.49%

+4.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-3.83%

-1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

4.01%

-2.05%

Volatility

VIG vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.42%, while VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIGMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

4.01%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.68%

9.90%

-2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.10%

13.90%

-3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.24%

18.19%

-3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

18.69%

-2.63%

VIG vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIG vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than MOAT's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.38%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.48%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIG and MOAT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOAT has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to VIG (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.45% vs 13.05% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 13.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.38% for MOAT.

VIG is categorized as Dividend, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.47% for MOAT.

VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIG and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer