VIG vs. IXC
VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIG returned 13.24%/yr vs 10.05%/yr for IXC. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VIG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
VIG vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 29.17% return. Over the past 10 years, VIG has outperformed IXC with an annualized return of 13.24%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.05% annualized return.
VIG
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 18.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.24%
IXC
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 29.17%
- 6M
- 28.84%
- 1Y
- 38.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 19.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
VIG vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.68% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 29.17% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIG and IXC is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2006 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VIG and IXC has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VIG vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIG
IXC
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
VIG
IXC
-
Financial Services
VIG
IXC
-
Healthcare
VIG
IXC
-
Industrials
VIG
IXC
-
Consumer Defensive
VIG
IXC
-
Consumer Cyclical
VIG
IXC
-
Energy
VIG
IXC
Basic Materials
VIG
IXC
-
Utilities
VIG
IXC
-
Communication Services
VIG
IXC
-
Real Estate
VIG
-
IXC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIG vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
VIG
IXC
VIG vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIG | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.34 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 4.05 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.34 | 11.55 | -2.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIG vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIG | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.81% | -67.88% | +21.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.91% | -9.66% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -19.06% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -24.93% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.72% | -64.16% | +32.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -7.04% | +6.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -17.47% | +11.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 3.38% | -1.42% |
Volatility
VIG vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.93%, while iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIG | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 6.44% | -3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | 15.63% | -7.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.19% | 18.79% | -8.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 23.53% | -9.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 26.84% | -10.78% |
VIG vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIG vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than IXC's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.85% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIG and IXC have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXC has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to VIG (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs IXC's -67.88%.
On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.24% vs 10.05% for IXC. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.24% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXC.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.
VIG is categorized as Dividend, while IXC is Energy Equities. VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.40% for IXC.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIG and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer