VIG vs. IVV
VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIG returned 13.19%/yr vs 15.39%/yr for IVV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VIG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
VIG vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 8.48% return. Over the past 10 years, VIG has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 13.19%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.39% annualized return.
VIG
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 7.11%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 18.41%
- 3Y*
- 15.97%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- 13.19%
IVV
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 8.48%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- 1Y
- 24.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.99%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 15.39%
VIG vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.11% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.48% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIG and IVV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2006 | 0.93 |
The correlation between VIG and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VIG vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIG
IVV
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
VIG
IVV
Financial Services
VIG
IVV
Healthcare
VIG
IVV
Industrials
VIG
IVV
Consumer Defensive
VIG
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
VIG
IVV
Energy
VIG
IVV
Basic Materials
VIG
IVV
Utilities
VIG
IVV
Communication Services
VIG
IVV
Real Estate
VIG
-
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIG vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
VIG
IVV
VIG vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIG | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 2.73 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.39 | 12.34 | -2.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIG vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIG | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.81% | -55.25% | +8.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.91% | -8.89% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -18.75% | +3.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -24.53% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.72% | -33.90% | +2.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -2.88% | +2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -10.77% | +5.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 1.96% | 0.00% |
Volatility
VIG vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.90%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIG | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 4.37% | -1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.83% | 9.59% | -1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.18% | 12.27% | -2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 16.95% | -2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 18.08% | -2.02% |
VIG vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VIG vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than IVV's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.09% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIG and IVV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVV has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to VIG (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.39% vs 13.19% for VIG. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.39% return vs 13.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for VIG.
VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.09% for IVV.
VIG is categorized as Dividend, while IVV is S&P 500. VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIG and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer