PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIDI vs. CIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIDI vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vident International Equity Fund (VIDI) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIDI achieves a 22.55% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, VIDI has outperformed CIL with an annualized return of 10.99%, while CIL has yielded a comparatively lower 8.21% annualized return.


VIDI

1D
-0.55%
1M
7.84%
YTD
22.55%
6M
25.74%
1Y
49.83%
3Y*
27.42%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
10.99%

CIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.44%
6M
7.94%
1Y
17.37%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
8.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIDI vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIDI
Vident International Equity Fund
22.55%41.83%6.03%18.92%-13.83%11.93%1.18%15.84%-17.65%33.56%
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
5.44%32.99%3.76%16.29%-16.00%11.07%7.21%19.13%-13.34%27.67%

Correlation

The correlation between VIDI and CIL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2015

0.66

The correlation between VIDI and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.79 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VIDI vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIDI
CIL

Industrials

18.8%
18.4%

Financial Services

18.5%
24.8%

Technology

13.7%
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
8.2%

Basic Materials

8.4%
6.6%

Energy

8.0%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
8.8%

Healthcare

6.1%
7.7%

Communication Services

6.0%
5.8%

Utilities

3.1%
6.6%

Real Estate

0.8%
2.2%

Industrials

VIDI
18.8%
CIL
18.4%

Financial Services

VIDI
18.5%
CIL
24.8%

Technology

VIDI
13.7%
CIL
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VIDI
10.4%
CIL
8.2%

Basic Materials

VIDI
8.4%
CIL
6.6%

Energy

VIDI
8.0%
CIL
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

VIDI
6.2%
CIL
8.8%

Healthcare

VIDI
6.1%
CIL
7.7%

Communication Services

VIDI
6.0%
CIL
5.8%

Utilities

VIDI
3.1%
CIL
6.6%

Real Estate

VIDI
0.8%
CIL
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIDI vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIDI
VIDI Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VIDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIDI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VIDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIDI Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

CIL
CIL Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIDI vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vident International Equity Fund (VIDI) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIDICILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.49

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.97

3.95

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.17

16.75

+2.42

VIDI vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIDI Sharpe Ratio is 3.47, which is higher than the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIDI and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIDICILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47

2.24

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.46

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.48

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.43

0.00

Drawdowns

VIDI vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIDI drawdown since its inception was -48.39%, which is greater than CIL's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIDI and CIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIDICILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.39%

-36.27%

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.07%

-4.60%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.54%

-11.96%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.00%

-29.89%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.39%

-36.27%

-12.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-0.58%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.39%

-6.56%

-3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

1.07%

+1.54%

Volatility

VIDI vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

Vident International Equity Fund (VIDI) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that VIDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIDICILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

0.00%

+4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.94%

4.23%

+7.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

8.19%

+6.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.94%

16.49%

-0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

17.17%

+0.85%

VIDI vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIDI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIDI vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

VIDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than CIL's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
1.67%2.70%3.46%2.91%2.41%3.04%1.73%2.69%2.85%2.17%2.34%0.43%
VIDI
Vident International Equity Fund
3.62%4.26%4.93%4.14%5.85%4.62%2.51%3.35%2.80%2.21%1.92%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIDI and CIL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIDI has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIDI dropped -48.39% vs CIL's -36.27%.

On 10-year performance, VIDI leads with 10.99% vs 8.21% for CIL. On fees, CIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIDI has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 8.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for VIDI.

VIDI has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 1.67% for CIL.

VIDI tracks Vident International Equity Index, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Vident and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for VIDI and 0.45% for CIL.

VIDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIDI and CIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer