PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIDI vs. FNDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIDI vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vident International Equity Fund (VIDI) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VIDI having a 17.25% return and FNDF slightly lower at 16.43%. Over the past 10 years, VIDI has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 11.07%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.17% annualized return.


VIDI

1D
-2.98%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
17.25%
6M
17.31%
1Y
41.24%
3Y*
25.13%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
11.07%

FNDF

1D
-2.61%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
16.43%
6M
16.74%
1Y
39.04%
3Y*
22.45%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
12.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIDI vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIDI
Vident International Equity Fund
17.25%41.83%6.03%18.92%-13.83%11.93%1.18%15.84%-17.65%33.56%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
16.43%40.99%2.29%20.22%-7.78%14.97%3.61%18.46%-14.21%23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between VIDI and FNDF is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2013

0.88

The correlation between VIDI and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIDI vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIDI
FNDF

Industrials

18.7%
15.5%

Technology

18.4%
14.4%

Financial Services

17.5%
16.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
10.8%

Basic Materials

7.7%
11.3%

Energy

7.0%
10.9%

Healthcare

5.9%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
6.5%

Communication Services

5.4%
4.9%

Utilities

2.6%
3.5%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.8%

Industrials

VIDI
18.7%
FNDF
15.5%

Technology

VIDI
18.4%
FNDF
14.4%

Financial Services

VIDI
17.5%
FNDF
16.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VIDI
10.5%
FNDF
10.8%

Basic Materials

VIDI
7.7%
FNDF
11.3%

Energy

VIDI
7.0%
FNDF
10.9%

Healthcare

VIDI
5.9%
FNDF
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

VIDI
5.6%
FNDF
6.5%

Communication Services

VIDI
5.4%
FNDF
4.9%

Utilities

VIDI
2.6%
FNDF
3.5%

Real Estate

VIDI
0.7%
FNDF
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIDI vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIDI
VIDI Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VIDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIDI Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VIDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIDI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDF
FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIDI vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vident International Equity Fund (VIDI) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VIDIFNDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.44

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

3.70

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.07

13.74

+1.34

VIDI vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIDI Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIDI and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIDI vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIDI drawdown since its inception was -48.39%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIDI and FNDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIDIFNDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.39%

-40.14%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.07%

-10.60%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.54%

-13.89%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.35%

-25.56%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.39%

-40.14%

-8.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.31%

-4.59%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.37%

-7.62%

-2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.85%

-0.11%

Volatility

VIDI vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

Vident International Equity Fund (VIDI) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) have volatilities of 7.02% and 6.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIDIFNDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

6.77%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.48%

13.93%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67%

16.16%

-0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.16%

16.36%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

17.47%

+0.49%

VIDI vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIDI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIDI vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

VIDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than FNDF's 2.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
2.95%3.44%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%
VIDI
Vident International Equity Fund
3.98%4.26%4.93%4.14%5.85%4.62%2.51%3.35%2.80%2.21%1.92%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIDI and FNDF have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIDI has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to FNDF (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIDI dropped -48.39% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

On 10-year performance, FNDF leads with 12.17% vs 11.07% for VIDI. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDF has been the lower-risk option at 6.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 12.17% return vs 11.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for VIDI.

VIDI has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 2.95% for FNDF.

VIDI tracks Vident International Equity Index, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Vident and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for VIDI and 0.25% for FNDF.

VIDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIDI and FNDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer