VICE vs. PEJ
VICE (AdvisorShares Vice ETF) and PEJ (Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. VICE is actively managed, while PEJ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VICE returned -0.32%/yr vs 3.81%/yr for PEJ. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VICE charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PEJ.
Performance
VICE vs. PEJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VICE achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly higher than PEJ's 1.65% return.
VICE
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 3.62%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- -1.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- -0.32%
- 10Y*
- —
PEJ
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- 1Y
- 15.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.88%
- 5Y*
- 3.81%
- 10Y*
- 6.54%
VICE vs. PEJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF | 3.62% | 1.56% | 18.27% | 3.01% | -18.28% | 8.50% | 22.45% | 20.05% | -16.93% | 4.31% |
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 1.65% | 17.78% | 25.08% | 15.73% | -25.37% | 22.78% | -10.29% | 13.82% | -9.31% | 1.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between VICE and PEJ is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2017 | 0.72 |
The correlation between VICE and PEJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VICE vs. PEJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VICE
PEJ
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
VICE
PEJ
Consumer Cyclical
VICE
PEJ
Communication Services
VICE
PEJ
Real Estate
VICE
PEJ
-
Basic Materials
VICE
PEJ
-
Technology
VICE
PEJ
Energy
VICE
-
PEJ
-
Financial Services
VICE
-
PEJ
-
Healthcare
VICE
-
PEJ
-
Industrials
VICE
-
PEJ
Utilities
VICE
-
PEJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VICE vs. PEJ — Risk / Return Rank
VICE
PEJ
VICE vs. PEJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) and Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VICE | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.16 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 1.55 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 4.00 | -4.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VICE | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 0.86 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.17 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.32 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
VICE vs. PEJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VICE drawdown since its inception was -38.27%, smaller than the maximum PEJ drawdown of -66.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VICE and PEJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VICE | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.27% | -66.03% | +27.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -10.29% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.55% | -25.75% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.23% | -35.44% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.14% | -2.58% | -5.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.37% | -12.32% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.73% | 3.97% | +3.76% |
Volatility
VICE vs. PEJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) is 4.53%, while Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that VICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VICE | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 5.92% | -1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.10% | 13.90% | -4.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.19% | 18.48% | -5.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 22.79% | -5.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 24.75% | -5.56% |
VICE vs. PEJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VICE has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PEJ's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
VICE vs. PEJ - Dividend Comparison
VICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than PEJ's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 0.39% | 0.24% | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.92% | 0.39% | 0.78% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.52% |
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF | 0.76% | 0.79% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 2.47% | 1.72% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VICE and PEJ have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEJ has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to VICE (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VICE dropped -38.27% vs PEJ's -66.03%.
On 5-year performance, PEJ leads with 3.81% vs -0.32% for VICE. On fees, PEJ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, VICE has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PEJ has performed better with a 3.81% return vs -0.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PEJ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for VICE.
VICE has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.39% for PEJ.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for VICE and 0.55% for PEJ.
PEJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VICE and PEJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer