PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHYL.L vs. FUQA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHYL.L vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VHYL.L is traded in GBP, while FUQA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FUQA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHYL.L achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly higher than FUQA.L's 8.15% return.


VHYL.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
2.68%
YTD
10.73%
6M
12.06%
1Y
26.88%
3Y*
15.77%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*
10.73%

FUQA.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
3.67%
YTD
8.15%
6M
7.62%
1Y
24.02%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHYL.L vs. FUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VHYL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
10.73%18.23%11.22%5.25%5.95%19.23%-3.53%17.00%-6.59%5.59%
FUQA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
8.15%8.56%19.50%11.85%-0.00%27.82%8.23%27.23%1.10%-13.91%

Correlation

The correlation between VHYL.L and FUQA.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2017

0.79

The correlation between VHYL.L and FUQA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHYL.L vs. FUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHYL.L
VHYL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VHYL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FUQA.L
FUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHYL.L vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHYL.LFUQA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.50

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

4.12

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.90

16.52

-2.63

VHYL.L vs. FUQA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHYL.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is comparable to the FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHYL.L and FUQA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHYL.LFUQA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

2.65

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

0.68

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.45

+0.25

Drawdowns

VHYL.L vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHYL.L drawdown since its inception was -27.87%, roughly equal to the maximum FUQA.L drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYL.L and FUQA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHYL.LFUQA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.87%

-27.34%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-6.01%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.79%

-20.49%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.79%

-20.49%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.06%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-7.12%

+3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.50%

+0.43%

Volatility

VHYL.L vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L) is 1.83%, while Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that VHYL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHYL.LFUQA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.83%

2.47%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.84%

6.43%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.64%

9.33%

-0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.76%

19.09%

-8.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.06%

22.46%

-9.40%

VHYL.L vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHYL.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FUQA.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHYL.L vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison

VHYL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, while FUQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUQA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VHYL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
2.50%2.79%3.08%3.37%3.67%3.08%3.28%3.34%3.63%3.09%2.88%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHYL.L and FUQA.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FUQA.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FUQA.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VHYL.L.

VHYL.L is categorized as Dividend, while FUQA.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. VHYL.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, while FUQA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VHYL.L and 0.25% for FUQA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHYL.L and FUQA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer