PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHYD.L vs. WQDS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHYD.L vs. WQDS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VHYD.L is traded in USD, while WQDS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WQDS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHYD.L achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly lower than WQDS.L's 13.88% return.


VHYD.L

1D
0.78%
1M
0.68%
YTD
11.63%
6M
11.86%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
10.74%

WQDS.L

1D
0.53%
1M
0.20%
YTD
13.88%
6M
14.00%
1Y
29.27%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
12.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHYD.L vs. WQDS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VHYD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
11.63%27.03%9.32%11.43%-5.45%17.84%-0.31%20.75%-11.71%9.80%
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
13.88%24.26%9.82%16.65%-7.07%16.41%-0.41%23.53%-7.89%-14.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VHYD.L and WQDS.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017

0.82

The correlation between VHYD.L and WQDS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

VHYD.L vs. WQDS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHYD.L
WQDS.L

Financial Services

28.2%
16.0%

Industrials

12.2%
9.5%

Healthcare

11.1%
13.5%

Technology

9.5%
37.3%

Energy

8.7%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
5.9%

Utilities

5.3%
2.9%

Basic Materials

5.2%
1.0%

Communication Services

3.4%
5.5%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.1%

Financial Services

VHYD.L
28.2%
WQDS.L
16.0%

Industrials

VHYD.L
12.2%
WQDS.L
9.5%

Healthcare

VHYD.L
11.1%
WQDS.L
13.5%

Technology

VHYD.L
9.5%
WQDS.L
37.3%

Energy

VHYD.L
8.7%
WQDS.L
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

VHYD.L
8.5%
WQDS.L
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VHYD.L
7.2%
WQDS.L
5.9%

Utilities

VHYD.L
5.3%
WQDS.L
2.9%

Basic Materials

VHYD.L
5.2%
WQDS.L
1.0%

Communication Services

VHYD.L
3.4%
WQDS.L
5.5%

Real Estate

VHYD.L
0.8%
WQDS.L
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHYD.L vs. WQDS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHYD.L
VHYD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VHYD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

WQDS.L
WQDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHYD.L vs. WQDS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VHYD.LWQDS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.44

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.59

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.49

13.35

-0.85

VHYD.L vs. WQDS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHYD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHYD.L and WQDS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VHYD.L vs. WQDS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHYD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.60%, which is greater than WQDS.L's maximum drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYD.L and WQDS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHYD.LWQDS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.60%

-34.72%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.74%

-8.11%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.48%

-14.02%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.89%

-21.68%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-1.36%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-7.86%

+2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

2.19%

-0.03%

Volatility

VHYD.L vs. WQDS.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) at 3.04%. This indicates that VHYD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WQDS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHYD.LWQDS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

3.04%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.81%

9.27%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.80%

11.77%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.65%

13.81%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.27%

16.26%

-0.99%

VHYD.L vs. WQDS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHYD.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than WQDS.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHYD.L vs. WQDS.L - Dividend Comparison

VHYD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than WQDS.L's 2.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VHYD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
2.55%2.77%3.15%3.31%3.72%3.14%2.90%3.23%3.77%2.96%3.16%3.32%
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.13%2.34%2.56%2.86%2.97%2.70%3.03%3.10%3.19%0.79%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHYD.L and WQDS.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VHYD.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VHYD.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WQDS.L.

VHYD.L is categorized as Dividend, while WQDS.L is Global Equities. VHYD.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, while WQDS.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VHYD.L and 0.38% for WQDS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHYD.L and WQDS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer