PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHYD.L vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHYD.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHYD.L achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.45% return. Over the past 10 years, VHYD.L has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.90%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.23% annualized return.


VHYD.L

1D
0.23%
1M
1.09%
YTD
11.22%
6M
13.67%
1Y
27.08%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*
9.90%

VOO

1D
-2.59%
1M
0.50%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.18%
1Y
25.87%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*
15.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHYD.L vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VHYD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
11.22%27.03%9.33%11.41%-5.45%17.84%-0.31%20.75%-11.70%19.32%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.45%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VHYD.L and VOO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2013

0.49

The correlation between VHYD.L and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

VHYD.L vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHYD.L
VOO

Financial Services

28.6%
11.6%

Industrials

12.3%
8.3%

Healthcare

11.2%
8.5%

Energy

9.4%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
4.9%

Technology

7.7%
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
10.2%

Utilities

5.7%
2.4%

Basic Materials

5.1%
1.8%

Communication Services

3.5%
11.3%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.9%

Financial Services

VHYD.L
28.6%
VOO
11.6%

Industrials

VHYD.L
12.3%
VOO
8.3%

Healthcare

VHYD.L
11.2%
VOO
8.5%

Energy

VHYD.L
9.4%
VOO
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

VHYD.L
8.7%
VOO
4.9%

Technology

VHYD.L
7.7%
VOO
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VHYD.L
7.0%
VOO
10.2%

Utilities

VHYD.L
5.7%
VOO
2.4%

Basic Materials

VHYD.L
5.1%
VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

VHYD.L
3.5%
VOO
11.3%

Real Estate

VHYD.L
0.9%
VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHYD.L vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHYD.L
VHYD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VHYD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHYD.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHYD.LVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.39

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

2.92

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

13.53

-0.94

VHYD.L vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHYD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHYD.L and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHYD.LVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.15

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.80

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.85

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.88

-0.31

Drawdowns

VHYD.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHYD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.60%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYD.L and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHYD.LVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.60%

-33.99%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-8.90%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.48%

-18.69%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.89%

-24.52%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.60%

-33.99%

-2.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-2.90%

+2.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.47%

-3.69%

-1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

1.92%

+0.23%

Volatility

VHYD.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) is 2.97%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that VHYD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHYD.LVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

3.74%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

9.30%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.57%

12.10%

-1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.64%

16.84%

-3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.42%

18.02%

-2.60%

VHYD.L vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHYD.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHYD.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VHYD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VHYD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
2.48%2.77%3.15%3.31%3.72%3.14%2.90%3.23%3.77%2.96%3.16%3.32%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHYD.L and VOO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VHYD.L.

VHYD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. VHYD.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VHYD.L and 0.03% for VOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHYD.L and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer