VHT vs. XHS
VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) and XHS (SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - VHT tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index while XHS tracks the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VHT returned 10.08%/yr vs 9.10%/yr for XHS. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VHT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XHS.
Performance
VHT vs. XHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly lower than XHS's 26.76% return. Over the past 10 years, VHT has outperformed XHS with an annualized return of 10.08%, while XHS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.10% annualized return.
VHT
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 7.01%
- 6M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 1Y
- 24.97%
- 3Y*
- 9.50%
- 5Y*
- 5.59%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
XHS
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 21.53%
- YTD
- 26.76%
- 1Y
- 45.58%
- 3Y*
- 13.33%
- 5Y*
- 4.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.10%
VHT vs. XHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 6.42% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | 26.76% | 18.83% | 1.76% | 5.15% | -19.87% | 9.76% | 33.66% | 18.81% | 1.96% | 17.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHT and XHS is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.72 |
The correlation between VHT and XHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.72 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VHT vs. XHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHT
XHS
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
VHT
XHS
Financial Services
VHT
XHS
Industrials
VHT
XHS
Technology
VHT
XHS
-
Basic Materials
VHT
-
XHS
-
Communication Services
VHT
-
XHS
-
Consumer Cyclical
VHT
-
XHS
-
Consumer Defensive
VHT
-
XHS
-
Energy
VHT
-
XHS
-
Real Estate
VHT
-
XHS
-
Utilities
VHT
-
XHS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHT vs. XHS — Risk / Return Rank
VHT
XHS
VHT vs. XHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VHT | XHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.45 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 3.82 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.93 | 13.16 | -7.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VHT vs. XHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, roughly equal to the maximum XHS drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and XHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHT | XHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.12% | -39.32% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -11.99% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.91% | -17.81% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.71% | -31.34% | +13.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.85% | -39.32% | +10.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | -1.72% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -10.12% | +4.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 3.48% | +0.74% |
Volatility
VHT vs. XHS - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) at 5.41%. This indicates that VHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHT | XHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 5.41% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.48% | 12.81% | -1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.36% | 17.91% | -2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.21% | 21.22% | -6.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 22.40% | -5.41% |
VHT vs. XHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XHS's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VHT vs. XHS - Dividend Comparison
VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than XHS's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.55% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
XHS SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF | 0.20% | 0.27% | 0.38% | 0.23% | 0.19% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 2.37% | 0.34% | 0.22% | 0.28% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VHT and XHS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VHT has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to XHS (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs XHS's -39.32%.
On 10-year performance, VHT leads with 10.08% vs 9.10% for XHS. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, XHS has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VHT has performed better with a 10.08% return vs 9.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHS.
VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.20% for XHS.
VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while XHS tracks S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VHT and 0.35% for XHS.
XHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VHT and XHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer