VHT vs. VIS
VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) and VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while VIS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VHT returned 9.87%/yr vs 14.22%/yr for VIS. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
VHT vs. VIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than VIS's 15.65% return. Over the past 10 years, VHT has underperformed VIS with an annualized return of 9.87%, while VIS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.22% annualized return.
VHT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 16.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- 4.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
VIS
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
VHT vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -0.11% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 15.65% | 18.57% | 16.85% | 22.50% | -8.57% | 20.80% | 12.34% | 30.09% | -14.01% | 21.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHT and VIS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VHT and VIS has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VHT vs. VIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHT
VIS
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
VHT
VIS
Financial Services
VHT
VIS
Industrials
VHT
VIS
Technology
VHT
VIS
Basic Materials
VHT
-
VIS
Communication Services
VHT
-
VIS
Consumer Cyclical
VHT
-
VIS
Consumer Defensive
VHT
-
VIS
-
Energy
VHT
-
VIS
Real Estate
VHT
-
VIS
Utilities
VHT
-
VIS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHT vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank
VHT
VIS
VHT vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VHT | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.27 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 2.24 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | 9.28 | -5.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VHT vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, smaller than the maximum VIS drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and VIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHT | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.12% | -63.51% | +24.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -12.29% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.91% | -20.80% | +3.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.71% | -22.96% | +5.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.85% | -42.42% | +13.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -0.34% | -2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -8.37% | +2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 2.97% | +1.22% |
Volatility
VHT vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) is 4.88%, while Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that VHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHT | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 6.71% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 14.28% | -3.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 17.20% | -2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 18.48% | -3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 20.48% | -3.51% |
VHT vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VHT and VIS have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VHT vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison
VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than VIS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.64% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.88% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VHT and VIS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIS has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to VHT (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs VIS's -63.51%.
On 10-year performance, VIS leads with 14.22% vs 9.87% for VHT. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIS has performed better with a 14.22% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VHT and VIS have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.88% for VIS.
VHT is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VIS is Industrials Equities. VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index.
VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VHT and VIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer