VHT vs. SCZ
VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) and SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while SCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VHT returned 9.70%/yr vs 8.22%/yr for SCZ. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VHT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCZ.
Performance
VHT vs. SCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly lower than SCZ's 9.33% return. Over the past 10 years, VHT has outperformed SCZ with an annualized return of 9.70%, while SCZ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.22% annualized return.
VHT
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- -2.22%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 16.27%
- 3Y*
- 6.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
SCZ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 6M
- 10.37%
- 1Y
- 23.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.80%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
VHT vs. SCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -2.22% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 9.33% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHT and SCZ is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2007 | 0.60 |
The correlation between VHT and SCZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VHT vs. SCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHT
SCZ
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
VHT
SCZ
Financial Services
VHT
SCZ
Industrials
VHT
SCZ
Technology
VHT
SCZ
Basic Materials
VHT
-
SCZ
Communication Services
VHT
-
SCZ
Consumer Cyclical
VHT
-
SCZ
Consumer Defensive
VHT
-
SCZ
Energy
VHT
-
SCZ
Real Estate
VHT
-
SCZ
Utilities
VHT
-
SCZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHT vs. SCZ — Risk / Return Rank
VHT
SCZ
VHT vs. SCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VHT | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.28 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 2.03 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.87 | 7.65 | -3.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VHT vs. SCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, smaller than the maximum SCZ drawdown of -61.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and SCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHT | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.12% | -61.86% | +22.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -11.43% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.91% | -15.06% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.71% | -36.87% | +19.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.85% | -41.07% | +12.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.32% | -1.99% | -3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -13.04% | +7.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 3.02% | +1.19% |
Volatility
VHT vs. SCZ - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) have volatilities of 4.84% and 4.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHT | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 4.96% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 12.56% | -2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 14.89% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 16.80% | -1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 17.43% | -0.46% |
VHT vs. SCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SCZ's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VHT vs. SCZ - Dividend Comparison
VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than SCZ's 3.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.19% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.68% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VHT and SCZ have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCZ has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to VHT (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs SCZ's -61.86%.
On 10-year performance, VHT leads with 9.70% vs 8.22% for SCZ. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VHT has performed better with a 9.70% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.
SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 1.68% for VHT.
VHT is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SCZ is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VHT and 0.40% for SCZ.
SCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VHT and SCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer