PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGT vs. VCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGT vs. VCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 22.17% return, which is significantly higher than VCR's -1.18% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed VCR with an annualized return of 24.90%, while VCR has yielded a comparatively lower 13.52% annualized return.


VGT

1D
-1.93%
1M
2.27%
YTD
22.17%
6M
18.73%
1Y
46.85%
3Y*
30.40%
5Y*
20.14%
10Y*
24.90%

VCR

1D
0.65%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
-1.18%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
9.71%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
13.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGT vs. VCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
22.17%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
-1.18%5.77%24.27%40.38%-35.15%24.86%48.36%27.45%-2.31%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between VGT and VCR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between VGT and VCR has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGT vs. VCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VCR
VCR Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGT vs. VCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGTVCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.10

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

0.63

+2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.03

1.94

+7.10

VGT vs. VCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the VCR Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGT and VCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGTVCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

0.53

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.25

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

0.61

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.51

+0.16

Drawdowns

VGT vs. VCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum VCR drawdown of -61.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and VCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGTVCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.63%

-61.54%

+6.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.40%

-15.59%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

-27.36%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

-39.20%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

-39.20%

+4.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.57%

-5.68%

-2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-9.40%

+1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.20%

5.02%

+0.18%

Volatility

VGT vs. VCR - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 9.32% compared to Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) at 5.35%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGTVCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.32%

5.35%

+3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.56%

13.21%

+4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.64%

18.41%

+3.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.35%

24.00%

+1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.70%

22.41%

+2.29%

VGT vs. VCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VCR's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGT vs. VCR - Dividend Comparison

VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than VCR's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.74%0.74%0.74%0.84%0.98%0.79%1.71%1.17%1.37%1.21%1.60%1.32%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGT and VCR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to VCR (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs VCR's -61.54%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 24.90% vs 13.52% for VCR. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VCR has been the lower-risk option at 5.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 24.90% return vs 13.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VCR.

VCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while VCR is Consumer Discretionary Equities. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while VCR tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.10% for VCR.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGT and VCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer