VGT vs. TSXU
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
VGT vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 22.48% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 83.74% return.
VGT
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 22.48%
- 6M
- 20.33%
- 1Y
- 49.26%
- 3Y*
- 30.47%
- 5Y*
- 20.48%
- 10Y*
- 24.81%
TSXU
- 1D
- -19.03%
- 1M
- 9.50%
- YTD
- 83.74%
- 6M
- 75.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 22.48% | 0.27% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 83.74% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and TSXU is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
TSXU
VGT vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.59 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 2.41 | -1.75 |
Drawdowns
VGT vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than TSXU's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -35.62% | -19.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.34% | -24.75% | +16.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -10.62% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.15% | — | — |
Volatility
VGT vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 82.24% | -60.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.31% | 82.24% | -56.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.68% | 82.24% | -57.56% |
VGT vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGT vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than TSXU's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.58% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGT and TSXU have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.
VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for VGT and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer