VGT vs. PTF
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and PTF (Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while PTF is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGT returned 25.32%/yr vs 26.71%/yr for PTF. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTF.
Performance
VGT vs. PTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.23% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 72.71% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has underperformed PTF with an annualized return of 25.32%, while PTF has yielded a comparatively higher 26.71% annualized return.
VGT
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 24.23%
- 6M
- 28.20%
- 1Y
- 49.31%
- 3Y*
- 29.37%
- 5Y*
- 20.28%
- 10Y*
- 25.32%
PTF
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 15.15%
- YTD
- 72.71%
- 6M
- 81.71%
- 1Y
- 101.17%
- 3Y*
- 41.02%
- 5Y*
- 22.87%
- 10Y*
- 26.71%
VGT vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 24.23% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 72.71% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -31.75% | 18.10% | 82.06% | 46.71% | 0.01% | 32.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and PTF is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.85 |
The correlation between VGT and PTF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
VGT vs. PTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGT
PTF
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
VGT
PTF
Communication Services
VGT
PTF
Financial Services
VGT
PTF
Industrials
VGT
PTF
Energy
VGT
PTF
Consumer Cyclical
VGT
PTF
-
Basic Materials
VGT
PTF
-
Healthcare
VGT
PTF
-
Consumer Defensive
VGT
-
PTF
-
Real Estate
VGT
-
PTF
-
Utilities
VGT
-
PTF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
PTF
VGT vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGT | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.39 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 5.65 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.29 | 21.53 | -12.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGT vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, roughly equal to the maximum PTF drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and PTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -55.38% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -17.99% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | -36.11% | +8.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | -44.88% | +9.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | -44.88% | +9.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.03% | -2.88% | -4.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -13.26% | +5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.32% | 4.72% | +0.60% |
Volatility
VGT vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) is 10.57%, while Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a volatility of 16.22%. This indicates that VGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.57% | 16.22% | -5.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.18% | 31.49% | -13.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.28% | 40.70% | -18.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.47% | 35.44% | -9.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.76% | 33.22% | -8.46% |
VGT vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PTF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGT vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, more than PTF's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGT and PTF have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTF has higher volatility (16.22%) compared to VGT (10.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs PTF's -55.38%.
On 10-year performance, PTF leads with 26.71% vs 25.32% for VGT. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 10.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PTF has performed better with a 26.71% return vs 25.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.
VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while PTF is Momentum. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.60% for PTF.
PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGT and PTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer